Back to rankings

Aker BP ASA (AKRBF)

NEUTRAL
EnergyOil & Gas E&PNorway

Fundamental

48

Price

$348.40

Market Cap

$222.76B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Aker BP explores for, develops and produces oil and gas exclusively on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Rather than building fields from scratch everywhere, much of its strategy has been buying stakes in mature North Sea fields and modernising them with subsea technology and tied-back platforms to extract more oil at lower cost. It operates several field centres directly — Alvheim, Valhall, Skarv and Ula — and holds a large minority stake in Johan Sverdrup, one of Western Europe's largest oil fields, operated by Equinor.

How it makes money

Revenue comes from selling the oil and gas it extracts at prevailing market prices, plus smaller tariff income for letting other operators use its pipelines and platforms. Because prices are set by global commodity markets, Aker BP cannot control what it is paid; it instead competes on cost. The company has driven its production cost down to roughly $7-8 per barrel, well below the $10-12 many rivals report, and estimates its projects remain profitable even if oil prices fall to $35-40 a barrel.

Competitive moat

Cost advantage · Narrow

Aker BP reports a production cost of roughly $7-8 per barrel against $10-12 for many peers, and a portfolio breakeven around $35-40 a barrel, achieved by concentrating on mature, already-developed North Sea infrastructure rather than costlier frontier exploration. The advantage is real but not permanent: it depends on continued access to Norwegian licenses and on fields that will eventually deplete.

What drives demand

Cyclical

As a pure commodity producer, revenue rises and falls with global oil and gas prices, which move with worldwide economic growth, OPEC+ supply decisions and geopolitical events far outside the company's control. Low production costs cushion profitability in a downturn, but do not insulate revenue itself from the swings in the price the company is paid.

The case for

Buyers argue that Aker BP's production cost of roughly $7-8 per barrel, far below the industry average, lets it stay profitable at oil prices where many competitors would struggle, and that its stake in the still-growing Johan Sverdrup field gives it years of low-cost production ahead.

The case against

Sellers worry that revenue still depends entirely on a commodity price the company cannot control, that its assets are concentrated on a single continental shelf subject to Norwegian tax and regulatory policy, and that today's low-cost fields will eventually deplete and need replacing with costlier ones.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Generated on August 23, 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

Equinor ASAEQNR

The dominant operator on the Norwegian continental shelf, competing with Aker BP for the same exploration acreage and operatorships in every licensing round and selling the same Norwegian crude and pipeline gas to European buyers.

Vår Energi ASAVAR

The closest listed peer in profile: an independent producer focused almost entirely on the Norwegian continental shelf, chasing the same subsea tie-back projects, the same licence awards and the same oil and gas customers.

DNO ASADNO

After the Sval Energi acquisition it holds well over a hundred Norwegian offshore licences and was the third-largest winner in the latest APA round, directly behind Aker BP in the race for North Sea and Norwegian Sea acreage.

Harbour Energy plcHBR

Through its Norwegian arm it is both a licence partner and a rival bidder for Norwegian offshore acreage and producing-asset acquisitions, and it sells gas into the same European market.

OKEA ASAOKEA

A smaller Norwegian operator specialised in extending the life of mature offshore fields, competing with Aker BP for the same late-life assets, licence shares and offshore contractor capacity.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$11.86B

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Net Income

$1.42B

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Free Cash Flow

$-353M

Total Equity

$108.33B

Total Liabilities

$9.73B

Current Ratio

1.20

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

0.96

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$307.15

Current Price

$348.40

Margin of Safety

-13.4%

Fair Value Range

$199.65 - $414.66

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$329.25
DCF:$379.92
PE-based:$221.88
Graham Growth:$561.69
EPV:$74.61
Analyst Consensus:Buy (13B / 11H / 4S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-12.72%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

156.23

ROE

12.1%

P/B Ratio

19.75

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

90.1%

ROIC

6.0%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

6.0%

WACC

10.9%

ROIC − WACC

-4.9 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (10)

  • Price CAGR 9.01%
  • ROIC 6.0%
  • Gross Margin 90.1%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 57.1%
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 29.7%
  • PEG Ratio 1.46
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 6.94

Failed (9)

  • P/B Ratio 19.75
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • ROE 1.1%
  • Analyst Consensus 46% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg -22.8%
  • Net Margin Trend 1.2% vs 14.8%
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Unavailable (8)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

2/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

6.94

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Karl Johnny HersvikChief Executive Officer53
Mr. David Torvik TonneChief Financial Officer40
Mr. Per Harald KongelfChief Operating Officer66
Mr. Thomas Ditlev Hoff-HansenChief Information Officer53
Ms. Marit BlaasmoSenior Vice President of People and Safety50
Mr. Arne Tommy SigmundstadSenior Vice President of Drilling & Wells55
Mr. Ole-Johan MolvigSenior Vice President of Valhall53
Mr. Knut Arne Kristian SandvikSenior Vice President of Projects63
Ms. Ine DolveSenior Vice President of Alvheim50
Mr. Lars HoeierSenior Vice President- NOAKA58

Audit Risk

2

Board Risk

9

Compensation Risk

6

Shareholder Rights Risk

1

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for AKRBF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for AKRBF.