Back to rankings

Beazley plc (BZLYF)

NEUTRAL
Financial ServicesInsurance - SpecialtyUnited Kingdom

Fundamental

53

Price

$1298.00

Market Cap

$7.72B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Beazley is a specialist insurer operating mainly through Lloyd's of London: it underwrites risks that standard insurers avoid or price poorly, such as cyberattacks, kidnap and ransom, and large or unusual property and marine exposures. Brokers bring it individual risks, Beazley's underwriters price and accept them, and the company collects premiums up front in exchange for a promise to pay claims that may not surface for years.

How it makes money

Revenue is insurance premium, earned gradually over the life of each policy rather than booked all at once when it is written, plus investment income on the reserves held to pay future claims. Profit depends on charging more in premiums than the claims and expenses eventually paid out — a gap the industry calls the combined ratio — so the same dollar of premium can be very profitable or a loss depending entirely on how claims develop years later.

Revenue by segment

Specialty Risks32.3%

A broad book of professional liability, executive risk and other specialty commercial lines outside the other four categories.

Property Risks27.9%

Insurance on physical property and related business interruption, including large and catastrophe-exposed commercial risks.

Cyber Risks20.1%

Cover against data breaches, ransomware and other digital attacks — one of the newer and fastest-changing lines Beazley underwrites.

MAP Risks16%

Marine, aviation and political risk lines, grouped together as a single underwriting division.

Digital3.8%

Smaller commercial risks underwritten and distributed through digital, algorithm-driven channels rather than traditional broker placement.

Competitive moat

Patents and licences · Narrow

Underwriting specialty risks like cyber or kidnap and ransom well requires claims data and expertise built up over many years, which is hard for a new entrant to replicate quickly. The advantage is narrow rather than wide because capital, not just expertise, backs an insurer's ability to write business, and well-funded rivals can buy their way into the same specialty lines.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Insurance pricing moves in multi-year cycles driven by how much capital the industry has available to write risk: after large losses, prices rise and Beazley can charge more for the same risk; after a run of profitable years, new capital enters, competition increases and rates soften, as the company itself reported happening across its book in 2025.

Key risks

  • Catastrophe and cyber accumulation risk — The company identifies catastrophe risk — large events caused by nature such as hurricanes and earthquakes, or by people such as a coordinated cyberattack, pandemic or war — as a principal risk that can generate claims far larger than any single premium collected.
  • Softening underwriting cycle — Rates on renewal business decreased by 3.6% on average across the portfolio in 2025, a softening market that, if it continues, would compress the margin Beazley earns on the same risks over time.
  • Reserving and reserve adequacy — Beazley names reserving risk among its principal insurance risks: claims on specialty lines like cyber or professional liability can take years to emerge, so reserves set aside today may prove too low once the true cost of past policies becomes known.

The case for

Buyers argue that specialty underwriting expertise built over decades lets Beazley price risks that generalist insurers cannot, that a combined ratio in the low 80s shows real underwriting discipline rather than luck, and that cyber and other specialty lines still have room to grow as more of the economy needs that cover.

The case against

Sellers fear that softening rates on renewal business will keep compressing margins as more capital chases the same specialty risks, that a single large catastrophe or cyber event could produce losses far above what current reserves assume, and that reserves set years ago for slow-to-emerge claims may need to be strengthened later.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$5.55B

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Net Income

$654M

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Free Cash Flow

$-7M

Total Equity

$3.59B

Total Liabilities

$624M

Current Ratio

36.00

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

0.50

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Overvalued

Fair Value

$328.15

Current Price

$1298.00

Margin of Safety

-295.6%

Fair Value Range

$213.30 - $443.01

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$1272.14
DCF:$20.48
PE-based:$9.40
Graham Growth:$13.02
EPV:$13.09
Analyst Consensus:Buy (9B / 8H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-41.75%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

1179.36

ROE

14.2%

P/B Ratio

159.22

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

29.4%

ROIC

15.2%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

15.2%

WACC

7.4%

ROIC − WACC

+7.8 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (10)

  • Price CAGR 12.83%
  • ROIC 15.1%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 14.2%
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • ROE 13.9%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 15.5%
  • Analyst Consensus 53% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 0.88

Failed (8)

  • Gross Margin 29.4%
  • P/B Ratio 159.22
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • Earnings Surprise avg -13.0%
  • Net Margin Trend 15.0% vs 18.3%
  • Piotroski F-Score 1/9

Unavailable (9)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

1/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

0.88

Moderate: some gap between profits and cash

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Adrian Peter CoxCEO & Executive Director54
Ms. Barbara Plucnar JensenGroup CFO & Executive Director54
Mr. Troy DehmannChief Operating Officer-
Mr. Stuart SimpsonChief Investment Officer-
Mark MoerdykChief Technology Officer-
Ms. Sarah BoothHead of Investor Relations & Chair of the Diversity Steering Group-
Ms. Georgina Peters-VenzanoChief Marketing Officer-
Ms. Elizabeth Mary Jane AshfordChief People Officer & Head of ESG58
Mr. Jeremiah Edward Sullivan Jr.Head & Chair of US Management Committee-
Mr. Patrick HartiganGroup Head of Treaty-

Audit Risk

1

Board Risk

2

Compensation Risk

10

Shareholder Rights Risk

1

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for BZLYF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for BZLYF.