Back to rankings

DRDGOLD Limited (DRDGF)

NEUTRAL
Basic MaterialsGoldSouth Africa

Fundamental

63

Price

$4920.00

Market Cap

$43.12B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

DRDGOLD does not mine new gold ore. It reprocesses old surface tailings — the crushed waste rock left behind by a century of deep-level gold mining around Johannesburg, South Africa — to extract the small amounts of gold that earlier, cruder processing technology left behind. Its two operations, Ergo and Far West Gold Recoveries, run large-scale surface plants around the clock rather than underground shafts, which means lower safety risk and lower cost per ounce than conventional gold mining.

How it makes money

Revenue is simply tonnes of old tailings processed multiplied by the tiny amount of gold recovered per tonne, sold at the prevailing gold price. Because the company does not control the gold price, profitability depends on keeping processing costs and volumes efficient: it earns more by moving more material through its plants at low unit cost than by any pricing power. A rising gold price flows almost directly to profit, since the tailings feedstock itself is largely a sunk cost from decades ago.

Revenue by segment

Ergo72%

The original, larger surface tailings operation on Johannesburg's East Rand, still the majority of group production and revenue.

Far West Gold Recoveries28%

A newer operation reprocessing tailings from the West Rand, gaining ground as more dumps are brought into production.

Competitive moat

Cost advantage · Narrow

Reprocessing tailings that were already mined and crushed decades ago avoids the drilling, blasting and underground labour costs of conventional gold mining, giving DRDGOLD a lower cost structure than most primary producers. The advantage is site-specific, however: it depends on a finite, non-renewable supply of Witwatersrand-era tailings dumps that will eventually be exhausted.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Revenue moves almost one-for-one with the gold price and with the exchange rate between the US dollar and the South African rand, since gold is priced in dollars but most of the company's costs are in rand. A stronger rand against the dollar therefore erodes profitability even if the tonnage processed and the dollar gold price stay unchanged.

Key risks

  • Gold price dependence — A drop in the gold price directly reduces revenue and could affect the company's ability to pay dividends and fund capital expenditure, since DRDGOLD has no ability to influence the price it is paid.
  • Rand-dollar exchange rate — Gold is sold in US dollars but most operating costs are incurred in South African rand; a sustained strengthening of the rand against the dollar reduces reported profitability even at an unchanged gold price.
  • Regulatory and licensing risk — Adverse changes to South African mining, water or environmental regulation, or difficulty maintaining the governmental approvals the operations depend on, could disrupt production or raise compliance costs.
  • Operational disruption at key facilities — A major disruption at either the Ergo or Far West Gold Recoveries processing plants — mechanical failure, power supply issues or labour action — would have an outsized effect given the company's concentration in two operations.

The case for

Buyers argue that reprocessing already-mined tailings gives DRDGOLD structurally lower costs and lower operational risk than conventional underground gold mining, and that a rising gold price flows through to profit almost directly since the feedstock itself is largely a sunk cost.

The case against

Sellers worry that the business depends entirely on a gold price and a rand-dollar exchange rate it cannot control, that its tailings feedstock is a depleting, non-renewable resource, and that South Africa's power supply and regulatory environment add operational risk conventional miners in more stable jurisdictions do not face.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$12.86B

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Net Income

$3.19B

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Free Cash Flow

$2.14B

Total Equity

$12.75B

Total Liabilities

$4.69B

Current Ratio

3.62

Interest Coverage

57.32

Debt/EBITDA

0.00

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Overvalued

Fair Value

$1283.91

Current Price

$4920.00

Margin of Safety

-283.2%

Fair Value Range

$834.54 - $1733.27

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$4900.00
DCF:$44.61
PE-based:$22.52
Graham Growth:$251.74
EPV:$23.32
Analyst Consensus:Sell (1B / 2H / 5S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+13.37%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

1343.01

ROE

33.4%

P/B Ratio

398.94

P/FCF

2005.09

Gross Margin

33.1%

ROIC

27.6%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

27.6%

WACC

15.7%

ROIC − WACC

+11.9 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (15)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 55.37%
  • Price CAGR 20.50%
  • ROIC 27.6%
  • Gross Margin 33.1%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 31.2%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • ROE 32.6%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 13.5%
  • PEG Ratio 0.40
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.33

Failed (8)

  • P/FCF 2005.09
  • P/B Ratio 398.94
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Analyst Consensus 13% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg -156.2%
  • Piotroski F-Score 3/9

Unavailable (5)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)
  • Net Margin Trend (invalid data)

Piotroski F-Score

3/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.33

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Daniel Johannes Pretorius B.Proc., L.L.M., LLBCEO & Executive Director58
Mr. Wilhelm Jacobus Schoeman BTech AnaChief Operating Officer51
Ms. Henriette Hooijer B.Com., C.A.CFO & Executive Director44
Ms. Refiloe Vengeni B.Com., L.L.B.Legal Counsel36
Mr. Kevin Peter Kruger M.D., P., P.M.B.Head of Technical Services57
Mr. Henry Gouws MDPHead of Operations56
Ms. Kgomotso MbanyeleCompany Secretary44

Audit Risk

5

Board Risk

10

Compensation Risk

9

Shareholder Rights Risk

8

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for DRDGF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for DRDGF.