Back to rankings

Genmab A/S (GMAB)

POSITIVE
HealthcareBiotechnologyDenmark

Fundamental

80

Price

$34.23

Market Cap

$20.56B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Genmab, a Danish biotech, discovers antibody drugs and then largely lets bigger pharmaceutical companies manufacture and sell them, collecting a royalty on those sales instead. Its most important invention, daratumumab, is a multiple-myeloma antibody that Johnson & Johnson sells worldwide as DARZALEX; Genmab gets a cut of every dose sold. It also sells two of its own antibody drugs directly, EPKINLY/TEPKINLY for lymphoma, and keeps a pipeline of earlier-stage antibodies aimed at cancer and other diseases.

How it makes money

Most revenue is royalty income: a contractual percentage of what Johnson & Johnson and Novartis book selling DARZALEX and Kesimpta, which Genmab receives without bearing the cost of manufacturing, marketing or a sales force for those drugs. A smaller and faster-growing slice is net product sales from EPKINLY/TEPKINLY, which Genmab commercializes itself in some territories. The royalty model keeps margins very high but ties most of Genmab's fortunes to a single antibody it does not control commercially.

Revenue by segment

Royalty revenue83.4%

Contractual royalties on DARZALEX sales by Johnson & Johnson and Kesimpta sales by Novartis, the core of Genmab's income.

Net product sales10.2%

Direct sales of EPKINLY/TEPKINLY, the lymphoma antibody Genmab commercializes itself in the territories it retains.

Milestone, collaboration and other revenue6.4%

One-time and reimbursement payments from partners tied to development progress, a small and less predictable part of total revenue.

Competitive moat

Patents and licences · Narrow

Genmab's royalty stream is protected by patents on daratumumab and by an exclusive license that bars Genmab itself from developing a competing antibody against the same CD38 target. That protection is time-limited: the relevant patents begin expiring in the late 2020s and early 2030s across the US, Europe and Japan, after which royalty rates and revenue are expected to decline.

What drives demand

Defensive

Cancer treatment spending is not discretionary: patients and physicians do not defer chemotherapy or a myeloma drug because of the economy, and the drugs are largely covered by insurance or national health systems. Genmab's own revenue growth depends more on how many patients Johnson & Johnson's sales force reaches with DARZALEX and on Genmab's own launch execution for EPKINLY than on macroeconomic conditions.

Key risks

  • Dependence on a single partnered drug — About two-thirds of revenue comes from DARZALEX royalties, a drug Genmab does not manufacture or sell itself. Genmab's fortunes hinge on decisions and execution by Johnson & Johnson, a company it does not control.
  • Patent expiration reduces future royalties — Core daratumumab patents begin expiring around 2029 in the US and later in Europe and Japan; once they lapse, generic or biosimilar competition is expected to erode DARZALEX sales and Genmab's royalty income with them.
  • Disputes with licensing partners — Genmab has previously entered binding arbitration with Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) over terms of the daratumumab license agreement, showing that even its most important partnership is not free of contractual disagreement.
  • Manufacturing reliance on third parties — Genmab relies on a limited number of third-party contract manufacturers, some based in China, to produce the antibody drugs it sells directly, exposing it to supply disruption or geopolitical trade risk.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 66% of revenue

DARZALEX royalties from Johnson & Johnson alone accounted for about 66% of Genmab's 2025 revenue. A change in DARZALEX sales, pricing or J&J's marketing effort moves the majority of Genmab's income.

The case for

Buyers argue that royalty income on a market-leading, still-growing drug like DARZALEX carries almost no commercial cost or execution risk for Genmab, that EPKINLY's rapid growth shows the company can also succeed as a direct seller, and that years remain before the daratumumab patent cliff meaningfully dents revenue.

The case against

Sellers worry that a company earning two-thirds of its revenue from one partner's drug has limited control over its own destiny, that the patent cliff later this decade will eventually shrink the royalty stream that funds everything else, and that Genmab's own commercial drugs are not yet large enough to replace that income if the transition goes slowly.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$4.13B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$788M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$1.13B

Total Equity

$5.85B

Total Liabilities

$7.03B

Current Ratio

2.02

Interest Coverage

20.49

Debt/EBITDA

3.95

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Undervalued

Fair Value

$141.64

Current Price

$34.23

Margin of Safety

+75.8%

Fair Value Range

$92.06 - $191.21

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$38.84
DCF:$426.56
PE-based:$23.97
Graham Growth:$24.55
EPV:$168.18
Analyst Consensus:Buy (21B / 3H / 2S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+36.61%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

21.58

ROE

13.6%

P/B Ratio

0.35

P/FCF

1.82

Gross Margin

93.6%

ROIC

8.6%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

8.6%

WACC

7.8%

ROIC − WACC

+0.8 pp

ROIC is roughly in line with the cost of capital — the company is barely covering its capital cost.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 8.44%
  • Price CAGR 7.27%
  • ROIC 8.6%
  • Gross Margin 93.6%
  • P/FCF 1.82
  • P/B Ratio 0.35
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 33.6%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • ROE 13.6%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 19.2%
  • Analyst Consensus 81% Buy

Failed (3)

  • Earnings Surprise avg -1.8%
  • PEG Ratio 3.49
  • Piotroski F-Score 1/9

Unavailable (6)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)
  • Net Margin Trend (invalid data)

Piotroski F-Score

1/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

-

Low quality: investigate accounting

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Dr. Jan G.J. van de Winkel Ph.D.Co-Founder, President & CEO64
Mr. Anthony Pagano CPAExecutive VP & CFO47
Mr. Rayne WallerExecutive VP & Chief Technical Operations Officer57
Mr. Gregory David Emil MuellerExecutive VP, General Counsel & Chief Legal Officer54
Mr. Christopher CozicExecutive VP & Chief People Officer47
Dr. Martine J. van Vugt Ph.D.Executive VP & Chief Strategy Officer54
Mr. Martin SchultzSenior Director, Head of Development Business Partnership & Strategy and Director50
Dr. Judith V. Klimovsky M.D.Executive VP & Chief Development Officer67
Dr. Tahamtan Ahmadi M.D., Ph.D.Executive VP, Chief Medical Officer & Head of Experimental Medicines52
Dr. Mijke Zachariasse Ph.D.VP, Head of Antibody Research Materials & Director52

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for GMAB, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for GMAB.