Back to rankings

Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB)

NEUTRAL
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSingapore

Fundamental

50

Price

$3.57

Market Cap

$14.40B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Grab runs a 'superapp' used across Southeast Asia for ride-hailing, food and package delivery, and digital financial services, all inside one app. A driver or rider in Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam or Malaysia can book a car, order food from a local restaurant, pay a merchant with GrabPay, or take out a small loan, all without leaving Grab. It does not own the vehicles or restaurants involved; it connects independent drivers, riders, merchants and diners.

How it makes money

Grab earns a commission on each ride, delivery or payment that flows through the app, plus advertising fees from merchants who pay to be promoted and interest income from its lending business. Because drivers and merchants keep most of the transaction value, Grab's revenue is a slice of a much larger flow of money (GMV) rather than the full sale price, so profitability depends on that slice growing faster than the incentives Grab pays drivers and merchants to stay on the platform.

Revenue by segment

Deliveries53.4%

Food, grocery and package delivery across Southeast Asian cities, plus advertising revenue from restaurants and merchants on the platform.

Mobility36.2%

Ride-hailing bookings for cars, motorbikes and taxis across the region's major cities, the business Grab was originally built on.

Financial Services10.3%

Digital payments, consumer and small-merchant lending, and insurance distribution offered through the Grab app, the fastest-growing of the three segments.

Competitive moat

Network effects · Narrow

Grab benefits from classic two-sided network effects: more drivers on the app means shorter wait times for riders and diners, which attracts more users, which in turn attracts more drivers. The advantage is narrow rather than wide, though, because both drivers and users routinely run a rival app like Gojek alongside Grab and switch to whichever offers the better price at that moment.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Rides, food delivery and payments are used habitually and tied to daily life in the region's cities, giving demand some resilience, but spending on discretionary trips and food orders still slows when consumers in emerging Southeast Asian economies pull back, and currency swings across six-plus countries add another layer of variability to reported results.

Key risks

  • Intense regional competition — Gojek and other local players compete directly for the same drivers, riders and merchants across multiple countries, keeping pressure on prices and on the incentive spending needed to retain them.
  • Fragmented regulation across countries — Ride-hailing, delivery and digital lending are each regulated differently in Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia, and a rule change in any one market can force costly adjustments.
  • Driver classification risk — Drivers are treated as independent contractors rather than employees; a legal or regulatory change requiring employee status in any market would raise costs significantly.
  • Currency and macroeconomic exposure — Results are reported in US dollars but earned across several Southeast Asian currencies, so currency depreciation or a regional economic slowdown can reduce reported revenue even if local operations are stable.
  • Credit risk in the lending business — As Financial Services grows its loan book to consumers and small merchants, Grab takes on credit risk it did not carry as a pure ride-hailing and delivery company.

The case for

Buyers argue that Grab's superapp habit, its leading position in ride-hailing and delivery across Southeast Asia, and a financial-services arm that just turned the company profitable for the first time show a platform that can keep growing revenue per user for years.

The case against

Sellers fear that price-sensitive users and drivers who freely multi-home across Grab and Gojek will keep competition, and the incentive spending needed to win them, structurally high, limiting how much of that growth converts into durable profit.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$3.73B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$597M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$503M

Total Equity

$6.59B

Total Liabilities

$2.03B

Current Ratio

1.52

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

5.93

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$3.92

Current Price

$3.57

Margin of Safety

+8.9%

Fair Value Range

$2.55 - $5.29

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$5.86
DCF:$2.54
PE-based:$2.90
Graham Growth:$1.79
EPV:$0.24
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (27B / 2H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+157.51%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

32.00

ROE

7.7%

P/B Ratio

2.12

P/FCF

27.83

Gross Margin

40.5%

ROIC

0.7%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

0.7%

WACC

8.3%

ROIC − WACC

-7.6 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (12)

  • Gross Margin 40.5%
  • P/FCF 27.83
  • P/B Ratio 2.12
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • ROE 9.0%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 48.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 93% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 152.0%
  • Net Margin Trend 8.0% vs -3.8%

Failed (6)

  • Price CAGR -19.58%
  • ROIC 0.7%
  • CapEx intensity
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) -0.22
  • Piotroski F-Score 0/9

Unavailable (9)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

0/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

-0.22

Low quality: investigate accounting

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Ping Yeow TanCo-Founder, Chairman & CEO42
Mr. Alexander Charles HungatePresident, COO & Director58
Mr. Peter OeyChief Financial Officer54
Mr. John E. PierantoniChief Accounting Officer52
Mr. Suthen Thomas ParadathethChief Technology Officer43
Mr. Douglas EuDirector of Investor Relations & Strategic Finance-
Mr. Liam BarkerGroup General Counsel-
Ms. Hooi Ling TanAdvisor42
Ms. Chin Yin OngChief Organisation Capability Officer49
Mr. Ken Vin LekHead of Strategic Finance33

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for GRAB, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 3/23/2026POSITIVE
    Grab Strikes $600 Million Deal for Foodpanda Taiwan Business

    Grab Holdings Ltd. has announced a significant strategic move, agreeing to acquire Delivery Hero SE's Foodpanda operations in Taiwan for $600 million. This acquisition marks Grab's first expansion beyond its core Southeast Asian markets, signaling a bold growth strategy. The deal is expected to bolster Grab's market position and revenue streams by entering a new, potentially lucrative territory. Investors will be watching how Grab integrates Foodpanda Taiwan and leverages this expansion to drive future profitability and shareholder value.

via Markets Gazette