Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)
POSITIVEFundamental
68
Price
$1309.00
Market Cap
$63.15B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Monolithic Power Systems designs power-management chips: the small components that convert and regulate electricity inside servers, cars, phones and industrial equipment. Like NVIDIA, it is fabless — it designs the chips and has outside foundries manufacture them — so its edge comes from engineering rather than factories. What began as a supplier of chips for laptop and monitor power circuits now sells increasingly into AI data-center power delivery, the fastest-growing part of its business.
How it makes money
Revenue comes from selling chips to equipment makers, either directly or through distributors, recognized when the customer takes delivery — there are no subscriptions. Because MPS designs rather than manufactures, and its chips replace several older components with one, it can charge a premium over commodity power parts while keeping costs mostly to research and foundry capacity. The heaviest growth driver is the amount of power-delivery silicon each AI server rack now requires, far higher than in a conventional server.
Revenue by segment
Power chips for memory, storage drives, notebooks and graphics cards — the largest end market.
Power-delivery chips sold directly into AI servers and data-center racks — the segment tied most closely to AI infrastructure spending.
Power management for infotainment, lighting and driver-assistance systems sold to carmakers and their suppliers.
Power solutions for optical modules, routers and networking equipment used to build communications infrastructure.
Chips used in televisions, home appliances and other consumer electronics.
Power components sold into industrial and instrumentation equipment, the smallest end market.
Competitive moat
Switching costs · NarrowOnce an engineer designs an MPS chip into a car, server or phone, replacing it means re-qualifying a new part through months of testing — a cost few customers take on for a component that is a small fraction of the total bill of materials. That gives MPS pricing power on existing designs, but it must still win the next design cycle against larger rivals like Texas Instruments and Analog Devices from scratch.
What drives demand
CyclicalDemand mixes a cyclical core — automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production rise and fall with the broader economy — with a newer, even more concentrated driver: how much AI server capacity a handful of hyperscalers decide to build. That second driver has been the main source of recent growth, which makes results more dependent on a few large customers' capital budgets than the older, more diversified business was.
Key risks
- Concentration in a few AI infrastructure customers — Growth in the largest and fastest-growing segment depends on continued capital spending by a small number of very large data-center operators, whose plans can change without warning.
- Design-win competition from larger rivals — Texas Instruments, Analog Devices and other larger analog chipmakers compete for the same design sockets, and losing a design cycle can mean years without that customer's business.
- Dependence on outside foundries — MPS owns no fabrication plants and relies on contract manufacturers for wafers and packaging, so capacity shortages or supplier disruption limit how much it can ship.
- Cyclical end markets — Automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production all slow in a weaker economy, and inventory corrections at customers have caused sharp swings in orders before.
Customer concentration
MPS does not disclose individual customer names or percentages, but the Enterprise Data segment — its fastest-growing — is concentrated around a small number of AI computing customers, making that growth more fragile than the automotive or industrial businesses.
The case for
Buyers argue that each new generation of AI servers needs more power-delivery silicon than the last, that MPS's design-win model locks in revenue once a chip is chosen, and that Storage/Computing and Enterprise Data growth show the company capturing a disproportionate share of that buildout.
The case against
Sellers fear that the AI-driven growth rests on a handful of customers who could qualify a competing chip or slow their own capital spending, that automotive and industrial end markets remain cyclical, and that larger rivals with deeper resources will eventually contest the design wins MPS has won.
Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$3.27B
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Net Income
$802M
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$666M
Total Equity
$3.53B
Total Liabilities
$663M
Current Ratio
4.98
Interest Coverage
-
Debt/EBITDA
0.02
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$1124.29
Current Price
$1309.00
Margin of Safety
-16.4%
Fair Value Range
$730.79 - $1517.79
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
78.45
ROE
17.6%
P/B Ratio
16.21
P/FCF
107.85
Gross Margin
55.2%
ROIC
17.7%
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
17.7%
WACC
13.9%
ROIC − WACC
+3.8 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (19)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 21.91%
- Price CAGR 32.01%
- ROIC 17.7%
- Gross Margin 55.2%
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 28.7%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- ROE 21.9%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 27.0%
- Analyst Consensus 83% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 2.5%
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.03
- Share Dilution -1.0%
- Piotroski F-Score 7/9
Failed (7)
- P/FCF 107.85
- P/B Ratio 16.21
- CapEx intensity
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- PEG Ratio 2.92
- Net Margin Trend 24.5% vs 65.6%
Unavailable (2)
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Interest Coverage
Piotroski F-Score
Strong financial health
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Michael R. Hsing | Founder, Chairman, President & CEO | 65 |
| Mr. Deming Xiao | Executive Vice President of Global Operations | 62 |
| Ms. Saria Tseng | EVP of Strategic Corporate Development, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | 54 |
| Mr. Maurice Sciammas | Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales & Marketing | 65 |
| Mr. Robert W. Dean II | Interim Chief Financial Officer | 60 |
| Ms. Genevieve Cunningham | Senior Manager of Marketing Communications | - |
| Mr. Tony Balow | Vice President of Finance | - |
| Arthur Lee | Finance Manager | - |
Audit Risk
10
Board Risk
8
Compensation Risk
4
Shareholder Rights Risk
9
Part 2 · The price and when to enter
This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for MPWR, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 6/15/2026POSITIVEHere's How Much $1000 Invested In Monolithic Power Systems 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today
An investment of $1000 in Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) five years ago would have grown to approximately $4,790 today, representing a significant return of 379%. This performance outpaces the broader market and highlights the company's strong growth trajectory and investor appeal. MPWR's consistent revenue increases and expanding market share in the power management semiconductor sector have been key drivers. Investors considering the stock should note its historical performance as an indicator of potential future gains, though past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
via Markets Gazette