Back to rankings

BeiGene, Ltd. (ONC)

POSITIVE
HealthcareBiotechnologySwitzerland

Fundamental

71

Price

$379.00

Market Cap

$42.36B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

ONC trades under BeOne Medicines, formerly known as BeiGene, a global biotechnology company that discovers, develops and sells cancer drugs. Its lead product, Brukinsa, treats certain blood cancers by blocking an enzyme (BTK) the cancer cells need to survive. Unlike a diversified pharmaceutical company, BeOne's revenue and value are concentrated in a small number of approved oncology drugs sold through its own commercial teams in the United States, Europe and China.

How it makes money

Almost all revenue comes from product sales of approved drugs, chiefly Brukinsa, plus smaller in-licensed products such as Amgen's oncology portfolio that BeOne distributes in China. Because it sells directly rather than relying on royalties from a partner, it captures the full margin on each sale but also carries the cost of its own sales forces across multiple continents, and revenue depends on doctors continuing to prescribe its drugs over rival treatments.

Revenue by segment

BRUKINSA73%

The company's lead BTK-inhibitor drug for blood cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, sold globally and the main driver of growth.

TEVIMBRA13.8%

An immunotherapy antibody used against several solid tumor cancers, the company's second-largest product.

Amgen in-licensed products9.1%

Oncology drugs originally developed by Amgen that BeOne markets and sells in China under a licensing agreement.

Competitive moat

Patents and licences · Narrow

Patents on Brukinsa's chemical structure and manufacturing, plus regulatory approvals in dozens of countries, keep generic competitors out for a fixed period, and clinical data showing advantages over the first BTK inhibitor to market support doctor preference. The protection is time-limited by patent expiry and contestable by newer drugs in the same class, so it does not amount to a durable structural barrier.

What drives demand

Defensive

Cancer treatment is not discretionary spending and demand does not track the economic cycle; growth instead depends on winning regulatory approvals for new indications, expanding into new countries, and doctors switching patients from older drugs. The main swing factor is clinical and regulatory success, not the broader economy.

Key risks

  • Revenue concentration in a single drug — Brukinsa accounts for roughly three-quarters of revenue; a safety issue, a more effective competing drug, or loss of patent protection would have an outsized effect on the whole company.
  • Dependence on regulatory approvals — Selling a drug in a new country or for a new use requires approval from that country's health regulator, a process that can be delayed, restricted or denied regardless of clinical trial results.
  • Pricing and reimbursement pressure — Government and private payers in every market where the company sells negotiate or set drug prices and reimbursement terms, and unfavorable changes can reduce revenue on approved products without any change to the drug itself.
  • Clinical trial and pipeline risk — Future growth depends on drugs still in clinical trials succeeding and reaching approval; most experimental cancer drugs fail somewhere in that process, and a failure removes an assumed source of future revenue.

The case for

Buyers argue that Brukinsa's clinical data advantages over older BTK inhibitors are winning doctor preference and market share even as the drug class matures, that expansion into Europe and other markets outside the US and China still has room to run, and that the company reaching full-year profitability in 2025 for the first time shows the commercial model scaling.

The case against

Sellers fear that concentrating three-quarters of revenue in one drug leaves little room for error if a safety signal, a stronger competitor or a reimbursement setback emerges, that US growth has already begun decelerating from its earlier triple-digit pace, and that sustaining growth requires the pipeline to deliver new approvals on a schedule biotech development rarely respects.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$6.13B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$656M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$942M

Total Equity

$4.36B

Total Liabilities

$3.83B

Current Ratio

3.40

Interest Coverage

7.97

Debt/EBITDA

2.06

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Overvalued

Fair Value

$248.20

Current Price

$379.00

Margin of Safety

-52.7%

Fair Value Range

$161.33 - $335.07

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$433.02
DCF:$9.59
PE-based:$342.07
Graham Growth:$90.84
EPV:$19.12
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (11B / 1H / 0S)

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

845.41

ROE

6.6%

P/B Ratio

106.27

P/FCF

413.35

Gross Margin

88.9%

ROIC

10.3%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

10.3%

WACC

11.6%

ROIC − WACC

-1.2 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 28.57%
  • ROIC 10.3%
  • Gross Margin 88.9%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 15.1%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 78.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 92% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 16.6%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 2.26
  • Net Margin Trend 10.7% vs -3.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Failed (6)

  • P/FCF 413.35
  • P/B Ratio 106.27
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • ROE 5.2%
  • Share Dilution 10.1%

Unavailable (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

7/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

2.26

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

10.1%

Issuing new shares, diluting ownership

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. John V. OylerCo-Founder, Executive Chairman & CEO57
Mr. Wang Lai Ph.D.President and Global Head of Research & Development48
Dr. Xiaodong Wang Ph.D.Co-Chairman of Scientific Advisory Board, Non-Executive Director & Co-Founder62
Mr. Aaron RosenbergChief Financial Officer48
Mr. Chan LeeGeneral Counsel, Senior VP & Corporate Secretary57
Mr. Titus B. BallVP & Chief Accounting Officer51
Mr. Marcello DamianiChief Technology Officer55
Ms. Liza HeapesHead of Investor Relations-
Ms. Eleanor Duff Ph.D.Senior VP & Head of Corporate Communications-
Mr. Graham HardimanGlobal Head of Human Resources-

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for ONC, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for ONC.