Back to rankings

Insulet Corporation (PODD)

NEUTRAL
HealthcareMedical DevicesUnited States

Fundamental

77

Price

$142.15

Market Cap

$10.09B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Insulet makes the Omnipod, a small, tubeless, waterproof pod that sticks to the skin and delivers insulin automatically for people with diabetes, replacing syringes or tethered pumps. A companion app or handheld controller lets the wearer and, for its automated version, an algorithm adjust dosing in real time. Each pod is disposable and worn for about three days before being replaced, so a single prescription generates a recurring stream of pod purchases rather than a one-time equipment sale.

How it makes money

Revenue comes almost entirely from selling pods, priced per unit and billed through pharmacies, wholesalers or directly to patients depending on the market. Because pods are consumed continuously rather than bought once, revenue grows with the installed base of active users, not just with new prescriptions — a patient who starts on Omnipod tends to keep buying pods for years. Gross margins are high once manufacturing scales, since the underlying hardware and adhesive are inexpensive relative to the price charged.

Revenue by segment

US Omnipod70.9%

Pod sales to patients in the United States, sold mainly through pharmacies and increasingly billed like a prescription drug rather than durable medical equipment.

International Omnipod27.9%

Pod sales outside the US across more than 20 countries, growing faster than the US as reimbursement and awareness expand.

Drug Delivery1.3%

A small, shrinking legacy business supplying Insulet's pod technology to pharmaceutical partners for delivering non-insulin drugs.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Narrow

Patients, caregivers and endocrinologists build years of familiarity with Omnipod's app, alarms and refill routine, and insurance formularies lock in a specific device once approved. Switching to a competing pump means a new prescription, new training and a new payer authorization, which discourages moves — but rivals like Medtronic and Tandem offer similar convenience, so the advantage is real but not decisive.

What drives demand

Defensive

Demand is driven by the growing, chronic population of people with type 1 and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes, a need that does not disappear in a downturn. Growth also depends on how quickly insurers agree to cover Omnipod and on the pace at which patients switch from injections or rival pumps, both of which move independently of the broader economy.

Key risks

  • Single-product dependence — Virtually all of Insulet's revenue comes from one product platform, Omnipod. A safety recall, a manufacturing disruption or a technological leap by a competitor would hit the whole company at once, with no other product line to fall back on.
  • Reimbursement and coverage risk — Sales depend on private insurers, Medicaid and Medicare agreeing to cover Omnipod, and coverage terms vary by payer and geography. A shift to less favorable coverage or slower Medicare adoption would slow growth or cut realized prices.
  • Manufacturing concentration — Pods are produced at a small number of manufacturing sites. A quality problem, natural disaster or supply disruption at one of them could interrupt the ability to fill prescriptions worldwide.
  • Competition from other pumps and therapies — Medtronic, Tandem and other insulin pump makers compete for the same patients, and advances in oral or injectable diabetes drugs could reduce reliance on pumps altogether over time.

Customer concentration

Insulet sells through many pharmacies, wholesalers and distributors rather than to a few large accounts, and does not disclose reliance on any single customer for a material share of revenue.

The case for

Buyers argue that Omnipod's tubeless, disposable design keeps winning converts from injections and competing pumps, that recurring pod sales create a durable, growing revenue base, and that international expansion and pharmacy-channel access still have years of runway.

The case against

Sellers fear that dependence on a single product platform leaves little room for error, that reimbursement decisions outside the company's control can move pricing and volumes, and that competitors could eventually match Omnipod's convenience at a lower cost.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$3.05B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$375M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$378M

Total Equity

$1.52B

Total Liabilities

$1.68B

Current Ratio

2.48

Interest Coverage

8.77

Debt/EBITDA

1.68

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$172.33

Current Price

$142.15

Margin of Safety

+17.5%

Fair Value Range

$113.33 - $231.32

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$171.91
DCF:$229.38
PE-based:$120.65
Graham Growth:$274.39
EPV:$55.80
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (27B / 6H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+12.20%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

27.28

ROE

16.3%

P/B Ratio

7.09

P/FCF

34.34

Gross Margin

71.1%

ROIC

16.8%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

16.8%

WACC

10.0%

ROIC − WACC

+6.8 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (21)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 14.68%
  • ROIC 16.8%
  • Gross Margin 71.1%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 16.9%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 17.4%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 24.5%
  • Analyst Consensus 82% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 9.8%
  • PEG Ratio 0.27
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.36
  • Share Dilution -1.9%
  • Net Margin Trend 12.3% vs 10.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Failed (5)

  • P/FCF 34.34
  • P/B Ratio 7.09
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)

Unavailable (1)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

7/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.36

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-1.9%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Ms. Ashley A. McEvoyCEO, President & Director54
Ms. Flavia H. PeaseExecutive VP & CFO52
Mr. Eric BenjaminExecutive VP & COO42
Mr. John Wodick Kapples J.D.Senior VP & General Counsel65
Mr. Prem SinghSenior Vice President of Global Operations48
Mr. Amit GulianiSenior VP & CTO-
Ms. Clare TrachtmanVice President of Investor Relations-
Mr. Chuck MedovichSenior VP and Chief Quality, Regulatory & Compliance Officer-
Ms. Angela Geryak WiczekSenior Director of Corporate Communications-
Mr. Philip HildaleSenior Vice President of Sales & Customer Care-

Audit Risk

1

Board Risk

2

Compensation Risk

8

Shareholder Rights Risk

10

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for PODD, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 4/24/2026NEGATIVE
    This Insulet Analyst Is No Longer Bullish; Here Are Top 4 Downgrades For Friday

    Rothschild & Co has downgraded Insulet Corporation (PODD) from 'Overweight' to 'Equal-weight', citing a reassessment of the company's growth prospects and competitive positioning. This downgrade follows a series of analyst actions on other stocks, including FCX, IRDM, and DKNG. The shift in rating for PODD suggests potential headwinds or a less optimistic outlook from the analyst firm, which could impact investor sentiment and the stock's near-term performance. Investors should monitor management's commentary on future guidance and strategic initiatives.

via Markets Gazette