Back to rankings

Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX)

NEUTRAL
HealthcareBiotechnologyUnited States

Fundamental

62

Price

$62.20

Market Cap

$35.43B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Royalty Pharma buys the right to a slice of future sales of approved or late-stage prescription drugs, paying pharmaceutical and biotech companies or academic institutions upfront cash in exchange for a percentage royalty on the medicine's sales for years to come. It does not discover, manufacture or sell any drug itself: its entire business is acquiring and holding a large, diversified portfolio of these royalty contracts, collecting a payment from the drugmaker every time the underlying medicine is sold.

How it makes money

Revenue, which the company calls royalty receipts, is simply the royalty percentage applied to each partner drug's sales, so it rises and falls with how well the underlying medicines sell and how many years of patent protection remain before generic competition erodes them. Royalty Pharma has no salespeople or marketing spend tied to the drugs themselves; its own costs are mainly interest on debt used to fund royalty purchases and the team that sources and prices new deals, so profitability depends heavily on paying the right price for each royalty stream upfront.

Competitive moat

Scale · Narrow

Royalty Pharma is the largest dedicated buyer of drug royalties, which gives it access to the biggest and most attractive deals, a lower cost of capital than smaller rivals, and decades of underwriting data on how drug sales evolve after launch. That scale is a real edge in winning deals, but it does not protect any single royalty stream from patent expiry or from a drug simply underperforming.

What drives demand

Defensive

Royalty receipts depend on prescription drug sales, which are largely insulated from the broader economic cycle since patients keep taking medicines they need regardless of the economy. The bigger driver of any single year's results is the product mix in the portfolio — how a handful of large royalties like the cystic fibrosis franchise or Trelegy are performing — rather than macroeconomic conditions.

Key risks

  • Patent expiry and generic competition — Every royalty stream has a finite life tied to the underlying drug's patent protection; once patents expire and generics enter, royalty receipts from that product can fall sharply within a year or two.
  • Clinical, regulatory and commercial risk of underlying drugs — Royalty Pharma has no control over how the drugmakers it partners with run clinical trials, market their products or compete for prescriptions, so a disappointing launch or a safety issue with a partner drug directly cuts its receipts.
  • Deal-sourcing and capital-allocation risk — Future growth depends on continuing to find and win new royalty deals at attractive prices; if competition for these deals increases or the pipeline of available royalties dries up, growth slows even if the existing portfolio performs well.
  • Reliance on debt to fund royalty purchases — Royalty Pharma finances part of its portfolio with borrowed money, and higher interest rates or reduced access to credit markets raise the cost of funding new deals and can compress returns.

Customer concentration

Royalty Pharma does not disclose revenue by paying company, but states that no single product accounted for more than 26% of 2025 Portfolio Receipts, spreading the risk across dozens of royalty streams.

The case for

Buyers argue that a diversified portfolio of dozens of royalty streams smooths out the risk of any single drug disappointing, that recent deals on products like Voranigo and the cystic fibrosis franchise show Royalty Pharma can still find growth, and that royalty income is largely insulated from the economic cycle.

The case against

Sellers fear that the company's largest royalties will eventually face patent expiry and generic competition that new deals cannot fully replace, that its growth model depends on continuing to find attractively priced deals in an increasingly competitive market, and that the debt used to fund past acquisitions leaves less room to maneuver if interest rates stay high.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$2.54B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$812M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

-

Total Equity

$9.71B

Total Liabilities

$9.91B

Current Ratio

2.80

Interest Coverage

4.19

Debt/EBITDA

5.75

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Overvalued

Fair Value

$38.44

Current Price

$62.20

Margin of Safety

-61.8%

Fair Value Range

$24.98 - $51.89

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$64.75
DCF:$33.67
PE-based:$20.17
Graham Growth:$13.91
EPV:$26.81
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (14B / 2H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-22.95%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

32.80

ROE

7.9%

P/B Ratio

2.43

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

6.2%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

6.2%

WACC

6.9%

ROIC − WACC

-0.7 pp

ROIC is roughly in line with the cost of capital — the company is barely covering its capital cost.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (16)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 6.16%
  • ROIC 6.2%
  • P/B Ratio 2.43
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 59.6%
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 12.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 88% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 3.67
  • Share Dilution -3.7%
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

Failed (6)

  • Price CAGR 3.44%
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 2.3%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 0.2%
  • Net Margin Trend 32.0% vs 44.4%

Unavailable (6)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

5/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

3.67

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-3.7%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Pablo LegorretaFounder, Chairman of the Board & CEO62
Mr. Terrance P. CoyneExecutive VP & CFO-
Mr. Christopher HiteChairman of Partnering & Investments58
Dr. Marshall Jonathan Urist M.D., Ph.D.Head of Research & Investments49
Mr. Greg ButzExecutive Vice President of Partnering & Investments-
Mr. Eric Cornelius SchneiderSenior VP & Chief Technology Officer-
Dr. James Folmar Reddoch Ph.D.Executive VP of Investments & Chief Scientific Officer55
Mr. George Grofik C.F.A., CPASenior VP and Head of Investor Relations & Communications-
Mr. Arthur Richard McGivern J.D.Executive VP of Investment & Chief Legal Officer50
Ms. Molly SawayaExecutive VP & Head of Human Capital-

Audit Risk

2

Board Risk

4

Compensation Risk

7

Shareholder Rights Risk

7

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for RPRX, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for RPRX.