Trimble Inc. (TRMB)
NEUTRALFundamental
60
Price
$59.38
Market Cap
$14.05B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Trimble makes hardware — GPS receivers, laser levels, machine-control systems — and the software that runs on top of it, sold to construction firms, farmers, surveyors and trucking companies to help them position equipment precisely and manage their operations digitally. It has been reshaping itself from a positioning-hardware vendor into a software company: an increasing share of revenue now comes from subscriptions to design, project-management and fleet-tracking software rather than from selling a one-time piece of equipment.
How it makes money
Revenue is split between selling hardware and perpetual software licenses upfront, and collecting recurring subscription fees for cloud software and data services, with the subscription share growing steadily as a portion of the total. Because software carries much higher margins and recurs automatically, Trimble's profitability improves as annual recurring revenue rises relative to one-time hardware sales, even when equipment volumes are flat or declining in a soft construction or agriculture market.
Revenue by segment
Positioning hardware and machine-control systems for construction equipment and agriculture, sold mainly through equipment dealers.
Design, engineering and project-management software and services for architects, construction firms and building owners, Trimble's most software-heavy and fastest-growing segment.
Software and hardware that trucking fleets and freight brokers use to plan routes, track loads and connect shippers with carriers.
Competitive moat
Switching costs · NarrowOnce a construction or farming operation builds its workflows around Trimble's hardware and software, from field data collection to project design, switching to a competing ecosystem means re-training crews and re-integrating data across many tools, which discourages change. But the company competes against well-resourced rivals like Deere, Topcon and Hexagon in various pieces of its business, limiting how much this lock-in translates into pricing power.
What drives demand
CyclicalHardware sales follow construction and agricultural equipment cycles, which expand when building activity and farm income are strong and contract when interest rates rise or commodity prices fall. The growing subscription software base is more resilient than the hardware it is layered on top of, but Trimble's overall results still move with the broader capital-spending cycle in the industries it serves.
Key risks
- Construction and agriculture capex cyclicality — A large share of hardware revenue depends on construction firms and farmers being willing to invest in new equipment, and that spending slows quickly when interest rates rise or commodity and building-activity outlooks weaken.
- Software transition execution risk — Trimble's strategy depends on converting hardware customers to recurring software subscriptions faster than legacy hardware and perpetual-license revenue declines; a slower-than-expected transition would weigh on both growth and margins.
- Competition from larger, well-funded rivals — Trimble competes against much larger companies like Deere in some of its markets and specialized rivals like Topcon and Hexagon in others, any of which can outspend it on research or undercut it on price in a given product line.
- Dealer channel dependence — Much of the Field Systems hardware business is sold through third-party equipment dealers rather than directly, so Trimble's growth depends partly on decisions and inventory choices made by partners it does not control.
The case for
Buyers argue that Trimble's shift toward recurring software revenue and rising annual recurring revenue growth show the transformation from a hardware vendor to a software company is working, that its position across construction, agriculture and transportation diversifies it beyond any single end market, and that margins should keep expanding as the software mix grows.
The case against
Sellers fear that hardware sales tied to construction and agriculture equipment cycles remain volatile and can offset gains from the software transition, that larger competitors in each of Trimble's markets limit its pricing power, and that the shift to subscriptions temporarily depresses reported revenue even as underlying recurring revenue grows.
Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$3.78B
Trailing 12 months (through 7/3/2026)
Net Income
$-105M
Trailing 12 months (through 7/3/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$361M
Total Equity
$5.84B
Total Liabilities
$3.48B
Current Ratio
0.95
Interest Coverage
8.05
Debt/EBITDA
1.84
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$54.67
Current Price
$59.38
Margin of Safety
-8.6%
Fair Value Range
$35.54 - $73.81
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
34.23
ROE
7.3%
P/B Ratio
2.77
P/FCF
18.30
Gross Margin
69.8%
ROIC
7.1%
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
7.1%
WACC
11.1%
ROIC − WACC
-4.0 pp
ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (18)
- EPS shows upward trend
- Price CAGR 7.17%
- ROIC 7.1%
- Gross Margin 69.8%
- P/FCF 18.30
- P/B Ratio 2.77
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 17.0%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current Ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
- ROE 9.1%
- Analyst Consensus 95% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 6.4%
- Share Dilution -2.5%
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9
Failed (7)
- EPS CAGR 2.59%
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Revenue Growth 5Y -0.4%
- Net Margin Trend -2.8% vs 8.0%
Unavailable (3)
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
- Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
Piotroski F-Score
Mixed signals: some areas need attention
Earnings Quality
Low quality: investigate accounting
Share Dilution
Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Robert G. Painter | CEO, President & Director | 53 |
| Mr. Phillip Sawarynski | Executive VP & CFO | 51 |
| Mr. Ronald J. Bisio | Group President of Field Systems | 55 |
| Mr. Mark Schwartz | Group President of AECO Software | 49 |
| Mr. Chris Keating | Group President of Transportation & Logistics | 53 |
| Ms. Leah K. Lambertson | Senior VP of Operations & Head of Sustainability | - |
| Mr. Kenneth B. Bement | Chief Accounting Officer | 45 |
| Mr. Jim Palermo | Chief Information Officer | - |
| Mr. Michael Leyba | Director of Investor Relations | - |
Audit Risk
10
Board Risk
4
Compensation Risk
6
Shareholder Rights Risk
1
Part 2 · The price and when to enter
This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for TRMB, sourced from Markets Gazette.