Back to rankings

Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)

NEUTRAL
IndustrialsConsulting ServicesUnited States

Fundamental

64

Price

$188.53

Market Cap

$24.40B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Verisk collects claims, policy and loss data from nearly every US property-and-casualty insurer, then sells back the analytics, forms and risk models built from that pooled data. It is not an insurer: it never takes on underwriting risk itself. Instead it sits between insurers as a data cooperative of sorts, turning industry-wide information that no single carrier could assemble alone into pricing tools, fraud detection, and the standard policy language much of the industry relies on.

How it makes money

Most revenue comes from subscriptions: insurers pay recurring fees for continuous access to Verisk's databases, risk scores, and the standardized policy forms and loss-cost filings that regulators and carriers use as a common starting point. Because the underlying data pool grows more valuable as more insurers contribute to it, and because switching away means rebuilding underwriting workflows around a different data source, renewal rates are very high and pricing tends to rise steadily rather than swing with the economy.

Revenue by segment

Underwriting70.9%

Data, forms, rating and catastrophe-risk tools that insurers use to decide what to charge and whether to accept a policy in the first place.

Claims29.1%

Anti-fraud tools, property-damage estimating software and other services insurers use once a policyholder has filed a claim.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Wide

Verisk's forms, loss-cost filings and risk scores are embedded directly into how insurers price and write policies across nearly the whole US market, and much of that data reflects decades of pooled claims history that cannot be recreated by a new entrant. Replacing Verisk would mean rebuilding core underwriting infrastructure from scratch, which is why customer retention runs close to universal.

What drives demand

Defensive

Insurers need underwriting data and claims tools regardless of the economic cycle, since they must keep pricing and writing policies whether the economy is expanding or not. Revenue is therefore driven more by insurance-industry premium growth, new product adoption and pricing increases than by broader economic swings, making Verisk's business one of the steadier revenue streams among analytics companies.

Key risks

  • Regulatory scrutiny of pricing and data use — Insurance regulators periodically scrutinize how widely used rating and loss-cost data shapes pricing across an entire market, and any restriction on how that data can be used or shared would hit a core part of the business.
  • Reliance on the health of the P&C insurance industry — Nearly all revenue depends on property-and-casualty insurers continuing to grow and to value third-party data services; consolidation among large carriers could also reduce the number of paying customers.
  • Narrower revenue base after divestitures — Verisk sold several non-insurance businesses in recent years to focus on its core Insurance segment, leaving a narrower set of revenue streams than the company had a few years ago.
  • Competition and in-house build risk — Large insurers with enough scale can build some of Verisk's analytics internally or turn to smaller specialized data vendors, limiting how much Verisk can raise prices without prompting customers to look elsewhere.

The case for

Buyers argue that Verisk's data and workflow tools are so embedded in US insurance pricing that near-universal retention and steady mid-single-digit pricing power should continue for years, and that the pure-play Insurance focus after recent divestitures makes the business simpler to underwrite.

The case against

Sellers fear that regulatory attention to concentrated, widely used pricing data could eventually constrain how Verisk monetizes it, that growth is now tied to a single insurance-industry cycle rather than a diversified set of end markets, and that premium valuation multiples leave little room for anything less than flawless execution.

Segment figures from fiscal year 2025Sources: Verisk Reports Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2025 Financial Results

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$3.10B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Net Income

$910M

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$1.19B

Total Equity

$309M

Total Liabilities

$5.89B

Current Ratio

1.02

Interest Coverage

7.68

Debt/EBITDA

2.89

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$196.73

Current Price

$188.53

Margin of Safety

+4.2%

Fair Value Range

$149.77 - $243.70

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$237.71
DCF:$229.99
PE-based:$158.01
Graham Growth:$146.08
EPV:$99.90
Analyst Consensus:Buy (16B / 10H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+0.52%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

28.89

ROE

293.9%

P/B Ratio

79.50

P/FCF

22.03

Gross Margin

70.0%

ROIC

31.6%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

31.6%

WACC

7.4%

ROIC − WACC

+24.2 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 14.92%
  • Price CAGR 8.73%
  • ROIC 31.6%
  • Gross Margin 70.0%
  • P/FCF 22.03
  • Operating Margin 44.0%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 324.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 62% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 3.3%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.52
  • Share Dilution -1.8%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Failed (8)

  • P/B Ratio 79.50
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 2.0%
  • PEG Ratio 3.15
  • Net Margin Trend 29.3% vs 33.1%

Unavailable (1)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

7/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.52

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-1.8%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Lee M. ShavelCEO, President & Director58
Ms. Elizabeth D. MannExecutive VP & CFO49
Ms. Kathlyn Card BecklesExecutive VP & Chief Legal Officer50
Ms. Sunita Bhatia HolzerExecutive VP & Chief Human Resources Officer63
Mr. Nicholas DaffanStrategic Advisor55
Mr. David J. GroverController & Chief Accounting Officer53
Mr. Jeff NegreteCTO & Interim Chief Information Officer-
Ms. Stacey Jill BrodbarSenior Vice President of Finance & Investor Relations-
Ms. Yang ChenHead of Corporate Development & Strategy-
Ms. Melissa HendricksChief Marketing Officer-

Audit Risk

2

Board Risk

5

Compensation Risk

3

Shareholder Rights Risk

6

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for VRSK, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 2/23/2026POSITIVE
    Verisk Initiates $1.5 Billion Accelerated Stock Buyback

    Verisk Analytics Inc. has initiated a significant $1.5 billion accelerated share repurchase (ASR) program. This strategic move, involving agreements with several financial institutions, is a clear signal of management's confidence in the company's financial health and long-term growth prospects. By reducing the number of outstanding shares, the buyback aims to increase earnings per share (EPS), creating direct value for shareholders. The operation is supported by the company's strong cash flow generation, as reaffirmed in the announcement. For investors, this initiative not only suggests that management believes the stock is undervalued at current prices but also demonstrates a tangible commitment to returning capital, making Verisk a potentially more attractive asset in the data analytics and risk management sector.

via Markets Gazette