Zurück zu den Rankings

Afry AB (AFXXF)

NEUTRAL
IndustrialsEngineering & ConstructionSweden

Fundamental

69

Kurs

$103.10

Marktkapitalisierung

$11.63B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

AFRY is a Swedish engineering, design and advisory firm. It does not manufacture anything: it sells the expertise of roughly 18,000 engineers and consultants to clients building power plants, factories, roads, buildings and transport systems. Its work spans planning, technical design and project management for the energy transition and for industrial and infrastructure projects across the Nordics and internationally.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Revenue comes from billing clients for consulting hours and project work, either at hourly rates or as fixed-price contracts for a defined scope. Profitability depends heavily on utilization — how much of each consultant's time is billed to a client rather than idle — rather than on selling more of a physical product. Public-sector and utility clients tend to give a steadier project pipeline than industrial clients, whose spending follows their own capital-investment cycles.

Umsatz nach Segment

Industry44.8%

Engineering and advisory work for industrial clients across sectors such as forestry, mining, chemicals and manufacturing.

Transportation & Places35.9%

Design and planning for buildings, cities, roads and rail and other transport infrastructure.

Energy22%

Engineering for power generation, grids and renewable-energy projects, tied to the broader energy transition.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Zyklisch

AFRY's order book follows its clients' capital-spending plans: when industrial companies and utilities are confident enough to commit to new plants, grids or factories, they hire engineering firms to design them, and when that confidence drops, projects are delayed or shelved. Full-year 2025 net sales fell as clients navigated what the company itself described as market uncertainty across several of its business areas.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that the energy transition and infrastructure renewal across the Nordics and Europe give AFRY a long runway of engineering work, and that its scale and breadth across Energy, Industry and Transportation & Places let it win large projects that smaller specialist firms cannot staff alone.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers fear that a consulting business has little pricing power when client capital spending slows, as the 2025 sales decline showed, and that profitability rises and falls with staff utilization rates that management does not fully control once demand softens.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Generated on 23. August 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

Sweco AB (publ)SWEC B

Sweco is AFRY's closest Nordic rival, bidding for the same engineering, architecture and infrastructure design assignments from the same public authorities, utilities and property clients in Sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark.

Ramboll Group A/SNot tracked

Ramboll, foundation-owned and based in Copenhagen, competes with AFRY across the whole Nordic region for engineering, environmental and energy consulting mandates, and increasingly for the same work in the rest of Europe.

Rejlers AB (publ)REJL B

Rejlers sells technical consulting in electrical power, automation and industrial engineering to the same Swedish, Finnish and Norwegian energy and industry clients that make up AFRY's Energy and Industry divisions.

Norconsult ASANORCO

Norconsult competes head-on with AFRY for community planning, transport infrastructure and building design contracts in Norway and Sweden, where both firms bid on the same public tenders.

COWI A/SNot tracked

COWI, the Danish foundation-owned consultancy, overlaps with AFRY on bridges, water, energy and industrial engineering projects across the Nordics and in international infrastructure work.

WSP Global Inc.WSP

WSP runs one of Sweden's largest engineering consultancies and competes with AFRY for infrastructure, buildings and environmental design work both in the Nordics and on international projects.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$24.22B

Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie

Nettogewinn

$761M

Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie

Freier Cashflow

$2.49B

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$12.27B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$7.30B

Current Ratio

1.03

Zinsdeckungsgrad

-

Schulden/EBITDA

3.94

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Fair bewertet

Innerer Wert

$120.22

Aktueller Kurs

$103.10

Sicherheitsmarge

+14.2%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$78.14 - $162.29

Bewertungsmethoden

Analyst Target:$132.17
DCF:$280.81
PE-based:$65.76
Graham Growth:$52.21
EPV:$91.39
Analystenkonsens:Starker Kauf (9B / 3H / 0S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:-25.41%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

14.72

ROE

6.3%

P/B-Verhältnis

0.92

P/FCF

4.50

Bruttomarge

79.3%

ROIC

5.9%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

5.9%

WACC

6.5%

ROIC − WACC

-0.6 pp

ROIC is roughly in line with the cost of capital — the company is barely covering its capital cost.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (15)

  • ROIC 5.9%
  • Gross Margin 79.3%
  • P/FCF 4.50
  • P/B Ratio 0.92
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 5.5%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 6.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 75% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 3.13

Nicht bestanden (5)

  • Price CAGR -4.13%
  • ROE 6.3%
  • Earnings Surprise avg -23.9%
  • Net Margin Trend 3.1% vs 4.5%
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Nicht verfügbar (7)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

2/9

Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

3.13

Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt

Aktienverwässerung

-

Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Ms. Linda PalssonPresident & CEO51
Mr. Bo SandstromExecutive VP & CFO50
Ebba VassalloHead of Investor Relations-
Ms. Susan GustafssonExecutive VP & Group General Counsel52
Ms. Prima GamukamaCompliance & Ethics Officer-
Mr. Henrik TegnerEVP of Commercial & Communications55
Daniela SpetzEVP of Corporate Development and M&A35
Sara KlingenborgExecutive VP of People & Culture52
Mr. Nicholas OksanenEVP of Global Division Industry58
Helena PaulssonHead of Urban Development-

Prüfungsrisiko

2

Vorstandsrisiko

4

Vergütungsrisiko

8

Aktionärsrechterisiko

8

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for AFXXF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for AFXXF.