Baker Hughes Company (BKR)
POSITIVEFundamental
69
Kurs
$62.33
Marktkapitalisierung
$61.53B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Baker Hughes sells the equipment and services that oil and gas companies use to drill wells and produce hydrocarbons — drill bits, pumps, well-completion tools and field services — through its Oilfield Services & Equipment unit. Its Industrial & Energy Technology unit makes gas turbines, compressors and related equipment used across the broader energy industry, including new gas-fired power plants and liquefied natural gas facilities, plus industrial pumps and valves sold well beyond oil and gas.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
OFSE revenue tracks the drilling and production spending of oil and gas operators, split between equipment sales and ongoing service contracts tied to how much a well produces. IET revenue is more project-based: large turbines and compression trains are sold under multi-year contracts booked into backlog well before delivery, plus recurring aftermarket parts and service revenue on equipment already installed. That mix gives Baker Hughes more revenue visibility than a pure oilfield-services company, but exposes it to long project execution risk.
Umsatz nach Segment
Equipment and field services for drilling, completing and producing oil and gas wells, priced on both equipment sales and well output.
Gas turbines, compressors, LNG equipment and industrial pumps and valves, sold under multi-year contracts plus recurring aftermarket service.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Patente und Lizenzen · SchmalDecades of engineering know-how in drilling tools and large rotating equipment like gas turbines are hard for a new entrant to replicate, and installed equipment locks in recurring aftermarket service revenue. But Baker Hughes competes against similarly capable rivals — SLB and Halliburton in oilfield services, GE Vernova and Siemens Energy in turbines — so its technical edge is real but not exclusive.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
ZyklischOFSE revenue rises and falls with how much oil and gas companies choose to spend on drilling, which itself follows oil and gas prices closely. IET is somewhat steadier, supported by a multi-year order backlog and demand tied to LNG and power infrastructure buildouts, but its large project bookings can still swing sharply from year to year.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Oil and gas price cyclicality — OFSE demand depends on customers' drilling and production budgets, which expand and contract with oil and gas prices. A sustained downturn quickly cuts equipment orders and service activity.
- National oil company exposure — National oil companies control much of the world's reserves and often require local partnerships or content requirements; failing to meet those terms, or a change in a host government's policy, can restrict access to major projects.
- Large project execution risk — IET's growth relies on delivering large, multi-year turbine and LNG equipment contracts on time and on budget; cost overruns or delays on any major project can erode the margin built into the backlog.
- Energy transition uncertainty — A long-term shift away from fossil fuels would reduce demand for OFSE's core products over time, even as IET tries to offset that with gas, LNG and lower-carbon technology.
Kundenkonzentration
Baker Hughes serves a broad mix of international oil majors, independents and national oil companies; no single customer is disclosed as representing a material share of revenue.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that Industrial & Energy Technology's record backlog in gas turbines and LNG equipment gives Baker Hughes years of visible revenue tied to global power and gas infrastructure buildouts, diversifying it away from the pure oil-price cyclicality of its oilfield services business.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that OFSE remains hostage to volatile oil and gas prices, that IET's large multi-year projects carry real execution and cost-overrun risk, and that the long-term energy transition away from fossil fuels erodes the core oilfield business faster than new energy technology can replace it.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$27.73B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Nettogewinn
$3.10B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$2.54B
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$18.83B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$21.87B
Current Ratio
2.09
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
3.36
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$59.25
Aktueller Kurs
$62.33
Sicherheitsmarge
-5.2%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$45.36 - $73.14
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
20.35
ROE
13.7%
P/B-Verhältnis
3.09
P/FCF
19.67
Bruttomarge
-
ROIC
-
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
-
WACC
8.3%
ROIC − WACC
-
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (14)
- EPS shows upward trend
- P/FCF 19.67
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- ROE 16.3%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 6.0%
- Analyst Consensus 79% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 16.7%
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.43
- Net Margin Trend 11.2% vs 11.0%
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9
Nicht bestanden (5)
- Price CAGR -0.41%
- P/B Ratio 3.09
- CapEx intensity
- Low reliance on intangibles
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
Nicht verfügbar (8)
- ROIC NaN%
- Gross Margin NaN%
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Operating Margin NaN%
- Interest Coverage
- Price below Graham Number
- PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
- Share Dilution (missing shares data)
Piotroski F-Score
Gemischte Signale: Einige Bereiche bedürfen Aufmerksamkeit
Gewinnqualität
Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Lorenzo Simonelli | Chairman, President & CEO | 52 |
| Mr. Ahmed Moghal | Executive VP & CFO | 43 |
| Ms. Georgia M. Magno | Chief Legal Officer | 46 |
| Ms. Maria Claudia Borras | Chief Growth & Experience Officer and Interim EVP of Industrial & Energy Technology | 56 |
| Mr. Amerino Gatti | Executive Vice President of Oilfield Services & Equipment | 53 |
| Ms. Rebecca L. Charlton | Senior VP, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer | 46 |
| Mr. Chase Mulvehill | Vice President of Investor Relations | - |
| Mr. Fernando Contreras | VP, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary | - |
| Adrienne M.. Lynch | Vice President of Brand & External Communications | - |
| Mr. Muzzamil Khider Ahmed | Chief People & Culture Officer | - |
Prüfungsrisiko
3
Vorstandsrisiko
6
Vergütungsrisiko
8
Aktionärsrechterisiko
2
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for BKR, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 4/24/2026POSITIVEBaker Hughes | Outlook Despite Middle East Disruption
Baker Hughes reported earnings that surpassed analyst expectations, with CEO Lorenzo Simonelli affirming that the company's fundamental business outlook remains stable. This resilience is noted despite ongoing disruptions in the Middle East. The company's ability to maintain its forecast suggests strong operational execution and diversified revenue streams. Investors may find this reassuring, indicating that Baker Hughes is well-positioned to navigate geopolitical uncertainties and continue delivering value.
- 4/23/2026NEGATIVEBaker Hughes Likely To Report Lower Q1 Earnings; These Most Accurate Analysts Revise Forecasts Ahead Of Earnings Call
Baker Hughes is poised to report Q1 earnings on April 23rd, with analysts forecasting a decrease in earnings per share to $0.49 from $0.51 in the prior year. This projected decline, coupled with the recent $1.45 billion sale of Waygate Technologies, suggests potential headwinds or strategic shifts impacting profitability. Despite a 3.8% stock gain on Wednesday, the downward revision in earnings expectations presents a cautionary signal for investors ahead of the earnings call.
- 4/13/2026POSITIVEBaker Hughes Dumps Non-Core Unit In $1.45 Billion Deal
Baker Hughes has agreed to sell its Waygate Technologies division to Hexagon AB for $1.45 billion in cash. This strategic divestiture allows Baker Hughes to streamline its energy technology portfolio, focusing on its core oilfield services and equipment businesses. The deal is expected to strengthen Baker Hughes' balance sheet and enhance its operational efficiency. Investors may view this move positively as it signals a commitment to core competencies and improved financial flexibility, potentially leading to increased shareholder value.
- 4/7/2026POSITIVEBaker Hughes Expands in South America with Gas Project Win
Baker Hughes has secured a significant contract in Argentina for a natural gas project, underscoring the increasing global demand for efficient gas compression technology and robust energy security. This win is expected to boost Baker Hughes' revenue streams and solidify its position in the South American energy market. The deal highlights the company's strategic importance in facilitating energy infrastructure development and meeting growing energy needs in emerging markets. Investors may view this as a positive indicator of future growth and operational success for Baker Hughes.
- 3/4/2026NEUTRALBaker Hughes Seeks to Sell $10 Billion in Cross-Border Bond Sale
Baker Hughes Co. is planning a cross-border bond sale of approximately $10 billion to fund its acquisition of Chart Industries Inc. While a significant transaction, this falls under standard corporate finance activities aimed at supporting strategic growth. The impact on Baker Hughes' stock will depend on the successful integration of Chart Industries and synergy generation, but the bond issuance itself is neutral news for the equity market, focusing on debt.
via Markets Gazette