Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc (CCEP)
NEUTRALFundamental
60
Kurs
$109.72
Marktkapitalisierung
$47.70B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners does not make Coca-Cola's recipe or set its marketing; it is the independent bottler that turns concentrate supplied by The Coca-Cola Company into finished drinks and gets them onto shelves and into fridges across Europe, Australia, the Pacific and Indonesia. It owns the factories, trucks and delivery routes, negotiates with individual retailers, and also bottles some Coca-Cola-owned brands like Costa Coffee alongside sparkling and still drinks under long-term bottling agreements.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
Revenue is unit case volume multiplied by price, shaped by which brands, package sizes and sales channels each case comes from: a can sold through a vending machine or a bar earns a different margin than a large bottle sold in a supermarket. CCEP owns the manufacturing, packaging and delivery, letting it capture wholesale and retail margin, but it pays for concentrate and shares brand investment with The Coca-Cola Company, so its own pricing and product decisions stay bounded by the bottling agreement.
Umsatz nach Segment
Bottling and distribution across most of Western and parts of Central Europe, CCEP's original and largest geography.
Bottling and distribution in Australia, the Pacific islands, the Philippines and Indonesia, added through mergers that turned CCEP from a European into a global bottler.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Skaleneffekte · SchmalOwning the region's densest bottling plants and delivery routes for Coca-Cola brands is expensive to replicate, and the long-term bottling agreements give CCEP exclusivity in its territories. The advantage is narrow rather than wide because it depends entirely on The Coca-Cola Company continuing to want CCEP as its bottler and on Coca-Cola brands themselves staying popular; CCEP has no control over the product's formulation or brand strategy.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
DefensivSoft drinks are a low-ticket, habitual purchase that people keep buying through recessions, which makes overall volume fairly steady. The more variable part is mix: consumers can trade down from premium packages or immediate-consumption channels like bars and vending toward cheaper large-format packs at the supermarket, which lowers average price even if volume holds up.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Dependence on The Coca-Cola Company — Nearly all of CCEP's revenue comes from Coca-Cola-branded products, and it is the sole supplier of the concentrates and syrups needed to make them. Any strategic shift or reputational problem at The Coca-Cola Company affects CCEP directly, and CCEP does not control marketing or product formulation.
- Bottling agreement is not owned outright — CCEP's right to bottle Coca-Cola products rests on long-term agreements rather than owning the brand; the terms of those agreements, including territory and product scope, are negotiated with and can be changed by The Coca-Cola Company.
- Input cost and currency exposure — As a manufacturer operating across many currencies, CCEP is exposed to swings in packaging, sugar and energy costs and to foreign-exchange movements between its many European, Australian and Indonesian markets.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that owning the exclusive bottling rights for the world's leading soft-drink brand across a large, diversified set of markets provides steady, recession-resistant cash flow, and that continued mix shift toward premium packaging and immediate-consumption channels can keep growing revenue even where volume growth is modest.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that a business this dependent on a single brand owner has little room to diversify away from decisions made in Atlanta, that rising health consciousness and sugar taxes could weigh on sparkling-drink volumes over time, and that input-cost inflation can compress margins in a business with limited pricing power of its own.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$18.99B
Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie
Nettogewinn
$1.96B
Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie
Freier Cashflow
$1.58B
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$9.64B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$12.19B
Current Ratio
0.89
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
3.45
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$105.25
Aktueller Kurs
$109.72
Sicherheitsmarge
-4.2%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$88.21 - $122.30
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
24.80
ROE
23.5%
P/B-Verhältnis
5.90
P/FCF
30.13
Bruttomarge
36.3%
ROIC
10.3%
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
10.3%
WACC
6.4%
ROIC − WACC
+4.0 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (13)
- Price CAGR 13.15%
- ROIC 10.4%
- Gross Margin 36.3%
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 12.7%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- ROE 24.8%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 9.4%
- Analyst Consensus 73% Buy
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.55
- Net Margin Trend 9.3% vs 6.9%
Nicht bestanden (8)
- P/FCF 30.13
- P/B Ratio 5.90
- CapEx intensity
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Earnings Surprise avg -0.1%
- PEG Ratio 2.11
- Piotroski F-Score 2/9
Nicht verfügbar (6)
- EPS data insufficient
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Interest Coverage
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Share Dilution (missing shares data)
Piotroski F-Score
Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken
Gewinnqualität
Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Damian Paul Gammell | CEO & Executive Director | 55 |
| Mr. Ed Walker | Chief Financial Officer | - |
| Ms. Francesca Faure | Chief Information Officer | - |
| Sarah Willett | Vice President of Investor Relations | - |
| Ms. Svetlana Walker | General Counsel & Company Secretary | - |
| Ms. Veronique Vuillod | Chief People & Culture Officer | - |
| Mr. Stephen Clifford Moorhouse | Chief Customer Service & Supply Chain Officer | 58 |
| Mr. Leendert den Hollander | Chief Strategy Officer | 56 |
| Mr. Stephen Lusk | Chief Commercial Officer | - |
| Joe Franses | Vice President of Sustainability of CCEP | - |
Prüfungsrisiko
1
Vorstandsrisiko
7
Vergütungsrisiko
4
Aktionärsrechterisiko
9
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for CCEP, sourced from Markets Gazette.