Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP)
NEUTRALFundamental
66
Kurs
$128.91
Marktkapitalisierung
$13.33B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Check Point sells the firewalls and related security software that sit at the edge of a company's network, inspecting traffic entering and leaving to block intrusions, malware and data theft. It was one of the pioneers of the corporate firewall in the 1990s and still sells physical security appliances, but has been extending its portfolio into cloud security, endpoint protection and email security to compete with newer, cloud-native rivals.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
Revenue splits between selling hardware and perpetual software licences, ongoing security subscriptions that give customers access to updated threat protection, and software updates and maintenance contracts tied to the installed base. Subscriptions are the fastest-growing and most recurring part of the business, while hardware and one-time licence sales are lumpier and depend on new equipment refresh cycles.
Umsatz nach Segment
Recurring subscriptions giving customers access to updated threat prevention across network, cloud, endpoint and email products.
Support contracts and software updates tied to the large base of security appliances and software already installed at customers.
Security appliances and one-time software licences sold to new customers or as equipment refreshes for existing ones.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Wechselkosten · SchmalOnce Check Point's firewalls and security policies are configured deep inside a company's network, replacing them means re-architecting security operations, which customers put off unless something forces the change. That stickiness is weakening rather than strengthening: Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and CrowdStrike have been taking share in newer categories like cloud and endpoint security, so the advantage today looks narrow.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
Mäßig zyklischCybersecurity spending is treated by most enterprises as close to non-discretionary, since a breach can be far costlier than the security budget itself, which cushions demand relative to general IT spending. Even so, the pace of new deals and equipment refreshes still tracks overall enterprise IT budgets and can slow when companies broadly tighten spending.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Losing share to newer security vendors — Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, CrowdStrike and Microsoft are all competing aggressively in cloud and endpoint security, categories where Check Point's legacy firewall position gives it less of an edge.
- Transition toward subscription-based security — Growing security subscriptions faster than legacy hardware and licence revenue declines is an ongoing execution challenge, and a slower transition would weigh on overall growth.
- Israel-based operations and geopolitical risk — A significant part of Check Point's research and development and management is based in Israel, exposing the company to regional political and military conditions that could disrupt operations.
- Being targeted as a security vendor — As a maker of security products, Check Point is itself an attractive target for attackers; a breach of its own systems or a flaw discovered in its products would damage trust in a business built on protecting others.
- Dependence on channel partners — Much of Check Point's sales go through resellers and distributors rather than a direct sales force, so its results depend on those partners continuing to prioritise its products over competitors'.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that Check Point's security subscription revenue keeps growing at double-digit rates even as overall revenue growth is modest, that its large installed base of maintenance and support contracts provides a stable, high-margin recurring foundation, and that improving net margins show discipline as the mix shifts toward subscriptions.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers worry that Check Point's core firewall franchise keeps losing relative ground to faster-growing rivals in cloud and endpoint security, that overall revenue growth well below the broader cybersecurity market suggests share loss rather than category strength, and that Israel-based operations add a geopolitical risk most competitors do not carry.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$2.76B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Nettogewinn
$1.05B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$701M
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$2.72B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$1.97B
Current Ratio
1.67
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
2.33
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$153.32
Aktueller Kurs
$128.91
Sicherheitsmarge
+15.9%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$107.70 - $198.94
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
13.39
ROE
37.6%
P/B-Verhältnis
4.91
P/FCF
19.03
Bruttomarge
87.5%
ROIC
12.8%
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
12.8%
WACC
7.0%
ROIC − WACC
+5.8 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (13)
- ROIC 12.8%
- Gross Margin 87.5%
- P/FCF 19.03
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- ROE 36.4%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 5.7%
- Earnings Surprise avg 20.6%
- PEG Ratio 1.27
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.07
- Net Margin Trend 38.8% vs 33.0%
Nicht bestanden (6)
- Price CAGR 4.45%
- P/B Ratio 4.91
- CapEx intensity
- DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
- Analyst Consensus 42% Buy
- Piotroski F-Score 2/9
Nicht verfügbar (8)
- EPS data insufficient
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Operating Margin NaN%
- Interest Coverage
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- Share Dilution (missing shares data)
Piotroski F-Score
Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken
Gewinnqualität
Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Brig.Gen. Nadav Zafrir | CEO & Director | 54 |
| Ms. Nataly Kremer | Chief Product Officer and Head of R&D | - |
| Mr. Roi Karo | Chief Strategy Officer | - |
| Mr. Gil Friedrichl | General Manager of Workspace Security | - |
| Mr. Gil Shwed | Founder & Executive Chairman | 56 |
| Mr. Roei Golan | Chief Financial Officer | - |
| Mr. Jonathan Zanger | Chief Technology Officer | - |
| Mr. Ariel Pisetzky | Chief Information Officer | - |
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for CHKP, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 2/27/2026NEGATIVESphera Dumps 15,000 Check Point Software Shares Worth $3.1 Million
Sphera, a prominent investment fund, recently divested 15,000 shares of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., totaling $3.1 million. This move, which sees a significant entity reduce its exposure to the cybersecurity giant, could be interpreted by investors as a cautionary signal. While Sphera's exact motivations remain undisclosed, the sale of such a substantial stake might suggest a revised outlook on the company's future prospects or a strategic capital reallocation. Market participants will closely monitor Check Point Software, a leader in integrated protection across networks, cloud, and endpoints, to ascertain if this divestment foreshadows a shift in overall sentiment.
via Markets Gazette