Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF)
POSITIVEFundamental
85
Kurs
$171.64
Marktkapitalisierung
$25.83B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Cincinnati Financial sells property, casualty and life insurance almost entirely through independent local insurance agencies rather than direct-to-consumer channels or salaried agents. Commercial Lines covers businesses, Personal Lines covers homes and cars, Excess & Surplus Lines covers harder-to-place risks other insurers decline, and a life insurance subsidiary adds a smaller, steadier income stream. The company's pitch to agents is long-term partnership and quick, local claims handling, not the lowest price in the market.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
Customers pay premiums up front for a year of coverage, which Cincinnati recognizes as earned revenue gradually over that period; profit depends on collecting more in premiums than it pays out in claims and expenses, a ratio insurers call the combined ratio. Between collecting a premium and eventually paying a claim, the company invests that cash — its "float" — in bonds and stocks, and the investment income earned on that float is a second, separate source of profit.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Kein erkennbarer Vorteil · KeinerProperty-casualty insurance is a commodity product — a policy from Cincinnati and a similar policy from a competitor cover the same risk — so there is no structural barrier stopping a rival from underwriting the same business. What differentiates Cincinnati is execution: underwriting discipline and multi-decade relationships with independent agents, which are valuable but can be matched by a well-run competitor over time.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
ZyklischInsurance pricing moves in multi-year cycles: after a run of heavy catastrophe losses, insurers raise rates and tighten terms (a "hard market"), then competition eventually pushes prices back down. On top of that pricing cycle, actual results in any given year swing with the weather — a bad hurricane or hailstorm season can outweigh years of careful underwriting.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Catastrophe losses — The company can face unusually high catastrophe losses from weather, wildfire, cyberattacks or civil unrest, and states its own catastrophe models may be inaccurate or based on incomplete data.
- Reliance on independent agents — Agents are not obligated to sell Cincinnati's products and can promote competitors' policies instead; a weaker relationship with key agencies could shift new business elsewhere.
- State rate and coverage regulation — State regulators can restrict premium rates, limit the ability to cancel unprofitable policies, or impose new underwriting standards, constraining how the company responds to rising costs.
- Reinsurance availability and cost — Cincinnati manages catastrophe exposure partly through reinsurance; if that coverage becomes more expensive or harder to obtain, more risk stays on the company's own balance sheet.
Kundenkonzentration
Cincinnati insures millions of individual homes, cars and businesses through thousands of independent agencies, so no single policyholder concentration exists; the company does not disclose one.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that decades of stable relationships with independent agents and a track record of underwriting discipline let Cincinnati grow through insurance cycles that hurt less disciplined competitors, while investment income on its float adds a second profit engine largely uncorrelated with underwriting results.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that property-casualty insurance is a commodity business where any underwriting edge erodes over time, that a severe catastrophe year or a soft pricing cycle can wipe out several years of gains, and that reliance on independent agents leaves distribution outside the company's direct control.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$13.95B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Nettogewinn
$3.33B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$3.09B
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$15.91B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$25.09B
Current Ratio
2.08
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
0.20
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$424.59
Aktueller Kurs
$171.64
Sicherheitsmarge
+59.6%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$275.98 - $573.20
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
8.08
ROE
15.0%
P/B-Verhältnis
1.58
P/FCF
7.73
Bruttomarge
-
ROIC
-
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
-
WACC
7.9%
ROIC − WACC
-
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (21)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 10.88%
- Price CAGR 8.31%
- P/FCF 7.73
- P/B Ratio 1.58
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- ROE 20.9%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 10.9%
- Analyst Consensus 50% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 8.0%
- PEG Ratio 0.52
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.03
- Share Dilution 0.0%
- Net Margin Trend 23.8% vs 15.6%
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9
Nicht bestanden (1)
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
Nicht verfügbar (6)
- ROIC NaN%
- Gross Margin NaN%
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Operating Margin NaN%
- Current Ratio
- Interest Coverage
Piotroski F-Score
Gemischte Signale: Einige Bereiche bedürfen Aufmerksamkeit
Gewinnqualität
Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Steven Justus Johnston C.F.A., CERA, FCAS, MAAA | Executive Chairman | 65 |
| Mr. Stephen Michael Spray | President, CEO & Director | 59 |
| Mr. Michael James Sewell CPA | CFO, Principal Accounting Officer, Executive VP & Treasurer | 61 |
| Ms. Teresa Currin Cracas Esq. | Chief Risk Officer & Executive VP of The Cincinnati Insurance Company | 59 |
| Mr. Steven Anthony Soloria C.F.A., C.P.C.U. | Executive VP & Chief Investment Officer | 58 |
| Mr. Dennis E. McDaniel C.M.A., CPA, C.P.C.U., CFM | VP & Investor Relations Officer | 65 |
| Mr. Thomas Christopher Hogan Esq. | Executive VP, Chief Legal Officer & Company Secretary | 32 |
| Betsy E. Ertel C.P.C.U. | Vice President of Corporate Communications | - |
| Mr. Donald Joseph Doyle Jr., AIM, C.P.C.U. | Senior Vice President of The Cincinnati Insurance Company | 58 |
| Mr. William Harold Van Den Heuvel | Executive Vice President | 58 |
Prüfungsrisiko
6
Vorstandsrisiko
10
Vergütungsrisiko
4
Aktionärsrechterisiko
8
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for CINF, sourced from Markets Gazette.