Zurück zu den Rankings

Ericsson (ERIC)

POSITIVE
TechnologyCommunication EquipmentSweden

Fundamental

71

Kurs

$10.29

Marktkapitalisierung

$33.46B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

Ericsson designs and sells the radio and core network equipment, and the software that runs it, that mobile operators use to build and run their networks, from earlier generations through today's 5G. It also licenses a large portfolio of patents essential to mobile-standard technology. Alongside network hardware it sells software and managed services that help operators run their networks, plus a smaller enterprise business selling private wireless and communications software.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Most revenue comes from Networks — radio base stations, antennas and the software that runs them — sold and serviced under large, multi-year contracts with a limited number of mobile network operators worldwide. Cloud Software and Services adds recurring software and managed-services revenue on top of the hardware relationship. A separate stream of patent-licensing royalties on Ericsson's standard-essential mobile patents adds high-margin income not tied to equipment volumes.

Umsatz nach Segment

Networks63.8%

Radio base stations, antennas and related hardware and software that form the physical backbone of mobile networks.

Cloud Software and Services26.5%

Core network software, cloud infrastructure and managed services that help operators run and evolve their networks.

Enterprise8.9%

Private wireless networks and communications software sold to businesses outside the traditional mobile-operator customer base.

Other0.2%

Residual revenue not attributed to the three main reporting segments.

Wettbewerbsvorteil

Wechselkosten · Schmal

Mobile operators build their networks around one vendor's radio and core equipment for years at a time, because mixing vendors in the same network raises integration and support costs; once Ericsson wins a network, replacing it is disruptive and expensive. But Nokia, Huawei and Samsung offer comparable equipment and operators periodically re-tender contracts, so the advantage is not unassailable.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Zyklisch

Ericsson's sales follow the capital-spending cycles of mobile network operators, which invest heavily during a generational upgrade such as the 5G rollout and then pull back once networks are built out. A handful of very large operators account for much of this spending, so a slowdown or a delay in the next technology cycle affects revenue directly, with limited buffer from steady replacement demand.

Wichtigste Risiken

  • Customer concentration among large operators — The company derives most of its business from large, multi-year agreements with a limited number of significant customers; losing or renegotiating one materially affects results.
  • Technology-cycle dependence — Revenue is tied to the pace at which operators invest in new network generations; a delay in the next upgrade cycle beyond 5G would slow demand with no offsetting growth driver.
  • Competition from Nokia, Huawei and Samsung — Intense competition in network equipment, including from lower-cost vendors supported by state backing in some markets, pressures pricing and market share.
  • Geopolitical and trade restrictions — Government restrictions on network equipment vendors, such as security reviews or bans in certain countries, can shut Ericsson out of markets or force costly redesigns.

Kundenkonzentration

Ericsson discloses that a large share of revenue comes from large, multi-year agreements with a limited number of significant customers concentrated by industry and geography, though it does not break out the exact share held by its single largest customer.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that Ericsson's installed base and patent portfolio give it a durable position with operators through successive network generations, and that a future upgrade cycle beyond 5G would again drive multi-year equipment spending in its favour.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers fear that revenue concentrated among a handful of large operators leaves Ericsson exposed to their capital-spending decisions, and that Huawei and Samsung's lower pricing in several markets could keep eroding share and margins.

Segmentzahlen aus dem Geschäftsjahr 2025Quellen: Ericsson Annual Report 2025Ericsson Annual Report 2025 published

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$227.55B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Nettogewinn

$24.65B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Freier Cashflow

$30.71B

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$92.74B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

-

Current Ratio

1.12

Zinsdeckungsgrad

-

Schulden/EBITDA

-

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Unterbewertet

Innerer Wert

$74.57

Aktueller Kurs

$10.29

Sicherheitsmarge

+86.2%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$48.47 - $100.67

Bewertungsmethoden

Analyst Target:$9.67
DCF:$294.03
PE-based:$12.23
Graham Growth:$19.69
EPV:$100.85
Analystenkonsens:Halten (6B / 12H / 10S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:+2.68%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

13.10

ROE

26.1%

P/B-Verhältnis

0.33

P/FCF

1.00

Bruttomarge

48.1%

ROIC

-

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

-

WACC

8.0%

ROIC − WACC

-

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (11)

  • Price CAGR 5.77%
  • Gross Margin 48.1%
  • P/FCF 1.00
  • P/B Ratio 0.33
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • ROE 25.1%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 32.6%
  • PEG Ratio 1.29
  • Net Margin Trend 12.0% vs 0.0%

Nicht bestanden (3)

  • Revenue Growth 5Y 0.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 21% Buy
  • Piotroski F-Score 0/9

Nicht verfügbar (13)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • ROIC NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

0/9

Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

-

Niedrige Qualität: Rechnungslegung prüfen

Aktienverwässerung

-

Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Mr. E. Borje Ekholm MBA, MScCEO, President, Head of Segment Enterprise & Director62
Mr. Per NarvingerExecutive VP & Head of Business Area Networks51
Mr. Lars Sandstrom M.Sc.Senior VP, Head of Group Function Finance & CFO53
Mr. Chris HoughtonSenior VP, COO and Head of Group Function & Group Support59
Ms. Eva-Britt AlleniusChief Accounting Officer-
Mr. Erik EkuddenSenior VP, CTO & Head of Group Function Technology57
Daniel MorrisHead of Investor Relations-
Mr. Scott DresserSr. VP, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary and Head of Group Function Legal Affairs & Compliance58
Ms. Rebecca RohrChief Compliance Officer-
Peter OlofssonHead of Corporate Communications-

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for ERIC, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 3/3/2026NEGATIVE
    AI: Missori (Ericsson), Italia al palo su 5G Standalone, serve supporto pubblico

    Ericsson CEO, Missori, voiced concerns over Italy's lag in 5G Standalone adoption, emphasizing the need for increased public support. Speaking at the Mobile Congress in Barcelona, Missori highlighted the critical interconnection between networks, artificial intelligence, and 5G, a crucial area for future growth. Italy's slowdown could hinder infrastructure investments and technological innovation within the country, potentially impacting Ericsson's business prospects in a key market. The call for state intervention suggests significant hurdles that could delay the deployment of vital digitalization technologies.

via Markets Gazette