Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB)
NEUTRALFundamental
50
Kurs
$3.59
Marktkapitalisierung
$14.40B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Grab runs a 'superapp' used across Southeast Asia for ride-hailing, food and package delivery, and digital financial services, all inside one app. A driver or rider in Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam or Malaysia can book a car, order food from a local restaurant, pay a merchant with GrabPay, or take out a small loan, all without leaving Grab. It does not own the vehicles or restaurants involved; it connects independent drivers, riders, merchants and diners.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
Grab earns a commission on each ride, delivery or payment that flows through the app, plus advertising fees from merchants who pay to be promoted and interest income from its lending business. Because drivers and merchants keep most of the transaction value, Grab's revenue is a slice of a much larger flow of money (GMV) rather than the full sale price, so profitability depends on that slice growing faster than the incentives Grab pays drivers and merchants to stay on the platform.
Umsatz nach Segment
Food, grocery and package delivery across Southeast Asian cities, plus advertising revenue from restaurants and merchants on the platform.
Ride-hailing bookings for cars, motorbikes and taxis across the region's major cities, the business Grab was originally built on.
Digital payments, consumer and small-merchant lending, and insurance distribution offered through the Grab app, the fastest-growing of the three segments.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Netzwerkeffekte · SchmalGrab benefits from classic two-sided network effects: more drivers on the app means shorter wait times for riders and diners, which attracts more users, which in turn attracts more drivers. The advantage is narrow rather than wide, though, because both drivers and users routinely run a rival app like Gojek alongside Grab and switch to whichever offers the better price at that moment.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
Mäßig zyklischRides, food delivery and payments are used habitually and tied to daily life in the region's cities, giving demand some resilience, but spending on discretionary trips and food orders still slows when consumers in emerging Southeast Asian economies pull back, and currency swings across six-plus countries add another layer of variability to reported results.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Intense regional competition — Gojek and other local players compete directly for the same drivers, riders and merchants across multiple countries, keeping pressure on prices and on the incentive spending needed to retain them.
- Fragmented regulation across countries — Ride-hailing, delivery and digital lending are each regulated differently in Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia, and a rule change in any one market can force costly adjustments.
- Driver classification risk — Drivers are treated as independent contractors rather than employees; a legal or regulatory change requiring employee status in any market would raise costs significantly.
- Currency and macroeconomic exposure — Results are reported in US dollars but earned across several Southeast Asian currencies, so currency depreciation or a regional economic slowdown can reduce reported revenue even if local operations are stable.
- Credit risk in the lending business — As Financial Services grows its loan book to consumers and small merchants, Grab takes on credit risk it did not carry as a pure ride-hailing and delivery company.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that Grab's superapp habit, its leading position in ride-hailing and delivery across Southeast Asia, and a financial-services arm that just turned the company profitable for the first time show a platform that can keep growing revenue per user for years.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that price-sensitive users and drivers who freely multi-home across Grab and Gojek will keep competition, and the incentive spending needed to win them, structurally high, limiting how much of that growth converts into durable profit.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$3.73B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Nettogewinn
$597M
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$503M
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$6.59B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$2.03B
Current Ratio
1.52
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
5.93
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$3.92
Aktueller Kurs
$3.59
Sicherheitsmarge
+8.4%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$2.55 - $5.29
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
32.00
ROE
7.7%
P/B-Verhältnis
2.12
P/FCF
27.83
Bruttomarge
40.5%
ROIC
0.7%
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
0.7%
WACC
8.3%
ROIC − WACC
-7.6 pp
ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (12)
- Gross Margin 40.5%
- P/FCF 27.83
- P/B Ratio 2.12
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- ROE 9.0%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 48.4%
- Analyst Consensus 93% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 152.0%
- Net Margin Trend 8.0% vs -3.8%
Nicht bestanden (6)
- Price CAGR -19.58%
- ROIC 0.7%
- CapEx intensity
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) -0.22
- Piotroski F-Score 0/9
Nicht verfügbar (9)
- EPS data insufficient
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Operating Margin NaN%
- Interest Coverage
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
- Share Dilution (missing shares data)
Piotroski F-Score
Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken
Gewinnqualität
Niedrige Qualität: Rechnungslegung prüfen
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Ping Yeow Tan | Co-Founder, Chairman & CEO | 42 |
| Mr. Alexander Charles Hungate | President, COO & Director | 58 |
| Mr. Peter Oey | Chief Financial Officer | 54 |
| Mr. John E. Pierantoni | Chief Accounting Officer | 52 |
| Mr. Suthen Thomas Paradatheth | Chief Technology Officer | 43 |
| Mr. Douglas Eu | Director of Investor Relations & Strategic Finance | - |
| Mr. Liam Barker | Group General Counsel | - |
| Ms. Hooi Ling Tan | Advisor | 42 |
| Ms. Chin Yin Ong | Chief Organisation Capability Officer | 49 |
| Mr. Ken Vin Lek | Head of Strategic Finance | 33 |
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for GRAB, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 3/23/2026POSITIVEGrab Strikes $600 Million Deal for Foodpanda Taiwan Business
Grab Holdings Ltd. has announced a significant strategic move, agreeing to acquire Delivery Hero SE's Foodpanda operations in Taiwan for $600 million. This acquisition marks Grab's first expansion beyond its core Southeast Asian markets, signaling a bold growth strategy. The deal is expected to bolster Grab's market position and revenue streams by entering a new, potentially lucrative territory. Investors will be watching how Grab integrates Foodpanda Taiwan and leverages this expansion to drive future profitability and shareholder value.
via Markets Gazette