Zurück zu den Rankings

Insmed Incorporated (INSM)

NEUTRAL
HealthcareBiotechnologyUnited States

Fundamental

43

Kurs

$123.46

Marktkapitalisierung

$27.47B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

Insmed is a biopharmaceutical company that develops drugs for rare lung and inflammatory diseases with no or few approved treatments. Its first product, ARIKAYCE, is an inhaled antibiotic for a chronic lung infection caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. In August 2025 it launched a second product, BRINSUPRI (brensocatib), the first approved treatment for bronchiectasis, a disease that damages the airways and had no dedicated drug until then. Both are chronic therapies patients take on an ongoing basis rather than a single course.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Insmed books revenue when specialty pharmacies and distributors take delivery of product, net of rebates and discounts negotiated with payors. Both drugs are priced as specialty medicines for rare or underserved diseases, so a relatively small number of patients generates meaningful revenue per prescription. BRINSUPRI is only months into its launch, so 2025 revenue reflects a partial year; the company has guided to roughly a billion dollars of BRINSUPRI sales in 2026 as prescribing ramps.

Umsatz nach Segment

ARIKAYCE71.5%

Inhaled antibiotic for nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease, Insmed's original and still-largest product.

BRINSUPRI28.5%

First approved treatment for bronchiectasis, launched in August 2025 and still ramping toward a much larger patient population.

Wettbewerbsvorteil

Patente und Lizenzen · Schmal

Both drugs are protected by patents and by the years of clinical development it takes to prove a therapy safe and effective in a rare disease, which discourages new entrants. The moat is narrow rather than wide: orphan-drug status and regulatory exclusivity are time-limited, and competitors are actively developing rival treatments for the same conditions.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Defensiv

Both drugs treat chronic, serious lung conditions that patients and physicians do not defer because of the economy: once diagnosed, treatment is a medical necessity rather than a discretionary purchase, and it is largely paid for by insurance. Demand instead depends on diagnosis rates, physician awareness of a still-new disease category, and payor willingness to reimburse at the price set.

Wichtigste Risiken

  • Dependence on two products — Nearly all revenue comes from ARIKAYCE and the newly launched BRINSUPRI. Any manufacturing problem, safety signal or competitive setback affecting either drug would have an outsized effect on the company.
  • Reimbursement and pricing risk — Revenue depends on government and private payors continuing to cover both drugs at prices that support the business; unfavorable reimbursement decisions could reduce prescribing or force price concessions.
  • Reliance on third-party manufacturing — Insmed relies on outside manufacturers and suppliers to produce its drugs; a disruption at one of them could interrupt supply of a product for which there may be no immediate substitute.
  • Market acceptance of a new therapy — BRINSUPRI treats a disease that had no approved drug before it; how quickly physicians diagnose and prescribe for a newly defined market is uncertain and central to the 2026 growth the company has guided to.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that BRINSUPRI opens an entirely new, underdiagnosed disease category with no approved competitor, that ARIKAYCE still has room to grow as awareness spreads, and that a company moving from single-product to two-product commercial scale is closer to sustained profitability than its history suggests.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers worry that BRINSUPRI's launch trajectory could fall short of the roughly billion-dollar 2026 guidance if diagnosis and prescribing ramp more slowly than hoped, that rival companies are racing to develop competing bronchiectasis treatments, and that a business still built on two drugs remains fragile to a single setback in either one.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$1.14B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Nettogewinn

$-875M

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Freier Cashflow

$-968M

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$739M

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$1.53B

Current Ratio

3.72

Zinsdeckungsgrad

10.34

Schulden/EBITDA

-

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Unterbewertet

Innerer Wert

$200.05

Aktueller Kurs

$123.46

Sicherheitsmarge

+38.3%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$190.04 - $210.05

Bewertungsmethoden

Analyst Target:$200.05
DCF:-
PE-based:-
Graham Growth:-
EPV:-
Analystenkonsens:Starker Kauf (29B / 1H / 0S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:+92.50%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

-

ROE

-172.8%

P/B-Verhältnis

35.74

P/FCF

-

Bruttomarge

83.5%

ROIC

-39.9%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

-39.9%

WACC

9.1%

ROIC − WACC

-49.0 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (9)

  • Price CAGR 25.26%
  • Gross Margin 83.5%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 29.8%
  • Analyst Consensus 97% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 17.4%
  • Net Margin Trend -76.9% vs -259.8%

Nicht bestanden (11)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • ROIC -39.9%
  • P/B Ratio 35.74
  • Operating Margin -73.9%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • ROE -111.3%
  • Share Dilution 21.2%
  • Piotroski F-Score 4/9

Nicht verfügbar (7)

  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Price below Graham Number
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)

Piotroski F-Score

4/9

Gemischte Signale: Einige Bereiche bedürfen Aufmerksamkeit

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

-

Niedrige Qualität: Rechnungslegung prüfen

Aktienverwässerung

21.2%

Neue Aktien werden ausgegeben, Eigentum wird verwässert

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Mr. William H. Lewis J.D., M.B.A.President, CEO & Chairman56
Ms. Sara M. Bonstein M.B.A.Chief Financial Officer44
Mr. Roger Adsett M.B.A.Chief Operating Officer56
Mr. Michael Alexander Smith J.D.Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary47
Dr. Martina Flammer M.B.A., M.D.Chief Medical Officer61
Mr. Brian K. Kaspar Ph.D.Chief Scientific Officer51
Bryan DunnVice President of Investor Relations-
Ms. Christie CamelioChief Compliance Officer-
Ms. Claire MulhearnVice President of Corporate Communications-
Ms. S. Nicole Schaeffer M.B.A.Chief People Strategy Officer57

Prüfungsrisiko

5

Vorstandsrisiko

4

Vergütungsrisiko

6

Aktionärsrechterisiko

9

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for INSM, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for INSM.