Talen Energy Corporation (TLN)
NEUTRALFundamental
35
Kurs
$306.94
Marktkapitalisierung
$15.07B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Talen Energy owns and operates power plants totalling roughly 10.7 gigawatts, the centrepiece being its stake in the Susquehanna nuclear plant in Pennsylvania, alongside natural gas and coal generation. It sells the electricity it produces into the PJM regional grid that covers much of the mid-Atlantic and Midwest, and has begun signing long-term contracts to sell power directly to data centre operators such as Amazon Web Services instead of only to the open market.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
Revenue mainly comes from two sources: selling the electricity actually generated at prices set by the wholesale power market, and capacity payments earned simply for having generation available to the grid when needed, regardless of whether it runs. The multi-decade agreement to supply Amazon's Susquehanna-area data centres shifts part of future revenue toward long-term, fixed-price contracts, reducing exposure to swings in the merchant power price over time as it ramps up through the 2030s.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Patente und Lizenzen · SchmalOperating a nuclear plant requires a federal licence that takes years to obtain and a facility that takes decades to build, so Susquehanna's baseload output cannot realistically be replicated by a new competitor any time soon. That protects the nuclear share of the fleet, but Talen's gas and coal plants compete in an open wholesale market with no comparable barrier.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
Mäßig zyklischElectricity demand in Talen's PJM footprint is being pushed structurally higher by data centre and AI computing growth, which is a genuinely new and durable driver rather than a normal economic cycle. At the same time, the portion of output still sold into the open market remains exposed to swings in wholesale power prices driven by weather, fuel costs and grid conditions.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Exposure to wholesale power price swings — The portion of generation not yet covered by long-term contracts is sold at prices that fluctuate with weather, local grid conditions and broader energy markets, so results can vary sharply between periods.
- PJM capacity market and regulatory outcomes — A meaningful share of revenue depends on capacity auction results and PJM market rules, which regulators and grid operators can change in ways that reduce what generators like Talen are paid.
- Nuclear operating and regulatory risk — Susquehanna is subject to continuous oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; an unplanned outage, safety finding or licensing dispute could take a large, low-cost source of generation offline.
- Debt-funded acquisitions raising leverage — Talen has funded recent generation acquisitions partly with new debt, increasing financial leverage at a time when it is also committing to large, long-dated contracts.
- Long-dated contract execution risk — The Amazon agreement runs through 2042 and ramps up gradually; delivering on it reliably over two decades, and having the counterparty's needs stay as expected, is not guaranteed.
Kundenkonzentration
Talen does not disclose a customer revenue share, but its power purchase agreement with Amazon Web Services, ramping to up to 1,920 megawatts by 2032 under a contract running through 2042, is set to become a large and growing part of total revenue over time.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that owning scarce, carbon-free nuclear capacity next to a fast-growing data centre corridor puts Talen at the centre of AI-driven electricity demand, that the Amazon contract locks in decades of revenue at attractive terms, and that new nuclear capacity is too slow and expensive for competitors to add.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that the portion of output still exposed to merchant power prices can swing results sharply, that leverage taken on to fund recent acquisitions leaves less room for error, and that a two-decade contract with a single counterparty concentrates risk that will only become visible many years from now.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$3.92B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Nettogewinn
$-185M
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$606M
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$1.09B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$9.81B
Current Ratio
0.78
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
50.65
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$291.65
Aktueller Kurs
$306.94
Sicherheitsmarge
-5.2%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$189.57 - $393.72
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
-
ROE
-20.0%
P/B-Verhältnis
9.06
P/FCF
25.77
Bruttomarge
-
ROIC
0.5%
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
0.5%
WACC
8.8%
ROIC − WACC
-8.3 pp
ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (8)
- Price CAGR 69.98%
- P/FCF 25.77
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Revenue Growth 5Y 8.4%
- Analyst Consensus 87% Buy
- Share Dilution -19.1%
Nicht bestanden (13)
- EPS shows upward trend
- ROIC 0.5%
- P/B Ratio 9.06
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 2.2%
- CapEx intensity
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- ROE -14.1%
- Earnings Surprise avg -132.0%
- Net Margin Trend -4.7% vs 10.0%
- Piotroski F-Score 3/9
Nicht verfügbar (6)
- Gross Margin NaN%
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Interest Coverage
- Price below Graham Number
- PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
- Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
Piotroski F-Score
Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken
Gewinnqualität
Niedrige Qualität: Rechnungslegung prüfen
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Mark Allen McFarland | CEO & Director | 56 |
| Mr. Terry L. Nutt | President | 47 |
| Mr. Brad L. Berryman | Chief Operating Officer | 55 |
| Mr. Andrew M. Wright J.D. | Chief Administrative Officer | 58 |
| Mr. Cole Muller J.D. | Chief Financial Officer | 44 |
| Mr. Anthony J. Plagens | Senior VP & Chief Accounting Officer | - |
| Mr. Daniel Jude Kelly | General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | - |
| Ms. Taryne Williams | Director of Corporate Communications | - |
| Mr. Dale E. Lebsack Jr. | Chief Asset Development Officer | 49 |
| Mr. Christopher E. Morice | Chief Commercial Officer | 45 |
Prüfungsrisiko
6
Vorstandsrisiko
3
Vergütungsrisiko
4
Aktionärsrechterisiko
2
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for TLN, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 2/27/2026NEUTRALTalen (TLN) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
The news concerns the release of the Q4 2025 earnings call transcript for Talen Energy (TLN). While such an event is crucial for investors seeking to analyze the company's financial performance and future outlook, the specific content of the transcript is not available at this time. Investors typically await these details to assess results and guidance, which could influence market sentiment. Without key data points, the announcement itself remains a procedural update, lacking immediate directional implications for the stock's value.
via Markets Gazette