Zurück zu den Rankings

Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM)

NEUTRAL
EnergyOil & Gas MidstreamUnited States

Fundamental

55

Kurs

$44.32

Marktkapitalisierung

$23.72B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

Viper Energy owns mineral and royalty interests under oil and gas acreage in the Permian Basin, mostly operated by its controlling shareholder Diamondback Energy. It does not drill or operate wells itself: it collects a royalty percentage of the oil, gas and natural gas liquids produced by whoever operates the land, without paying any of the drilling or operating costs.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Revenue is royalty income: a contractual share of the value of oil, gas and natural gas liquids extracted from the acreage underlying its mineral interests, paid by the well operator regardless of who drills. Because it funds none of the drilling, completion or lease operating costs, almost all of that royalty income flows through to cash flow, and the main variables are commodity prices and how fast operators — chiefly Diamondback — drill the acreage.

Wettbewerbsvorteil

Kein erkennbarer Vorteil · Keiner

Oil, gas and natural gas liquids are commodities sold at prevailing market prices Viper does not control. Its advantage is a low-cost structure — no drilling or operating capital at risk — rather than pricing power or a durable barrier competitors cannot replicate by buying comparable acreage.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Zyklisch

Royalty income moves with oil and gas prices and with the pace at which operators drill the underlying acreage — both of which swing with the broader commodity cycle and operators' own capital budgets. A slowdown in drilling by Diamondback or other operators reduces future production without Viper being able to do anything about it.

Wichtigste Risiken

  • Dependence on operators it does not control — Viper earns nothing from acreage that is not drilled, and it has no say over an operator's pace of drilling, well design or capital budget — including Diamondback's own.
  • Conflicts of interest with the controlling shareholder — Diamondback is simultaneously Viper's largest operator, its controlling shareholder and the counterparty in acreage drop-down acquisitions, creating potential conflicts in how those transactions and operating decisions are priced and timed.
  • Commodity price volatility — Royalty income moves directly with oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, which are set by global supply and demand outside the company's control and can fall sharply and quickly.
  • Geographic concentration in the Permian Basin — Substantially all of Viper's acreage sits in a single basin, so a regional problem — pipeline bottlenecks, water disposal limits, or a local regulatory change — affects nearly the entire portfolio at once.

Kundenkonzentration

Diamondback Energy, Viper's controlling shareholder, operates roughly 35% of Viper's net royalty acreage, making it by far the largest single operator whose drilling pace determines revenue; the company does not disclose the exact percentage of royalty income tied to Diamondback.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that a royalty-only model with no drilling or operating costs converts an unusually high share of revenue into free cash flow, that being tied to Diamondback gives Viper visibility into a disciplined operator's development plans, and that further mineral acquisitions can keep growing the acreage base without diluting the cost structure.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers fear that dependence on Diamondback's drilling pace and on transactions with the same controlling shareholder concentrates risk in one counterparty, that a sustained drop in oil and gas prices hits royalty income directly with no operating cost buffer to absorb it, and that geographic concentration in a single basin leaves no diversification if a regional bottleneck appears.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$1.97B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Nettogewinn

$59M

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Freier Cashflow

-

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$4.45B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$2.31B

Current Ratio

6.37

Zinsdeckungsgrad

-

Schulden/EBITDA

0.89

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Fair bewertet

Innerer Wert

$55.84

Aktueller Kurs

$44.32

Sicherheitsmarge

+20.6%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$53.05 - $58.63

Bewertungsmethoden

Analyst Target:$55.84
DCF:-
PE-based:-
Graham Growth:-
EPV:$11.06
Analystenkonsens:Starker Kauf (24B / 1H / 0S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:-8.06%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

279.15

ROE

-1.5%

P/B-Verhältnis

1.73

P/FCF

-

Bruttomarge

-

ROIC

1.7%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

1.7%

WACC

7.3%

ROIC − WACC

-5.6 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (11)

  • Price CAGR 10.96%
  • P/B Ratio 1.73
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 12.7%
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 41.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 96% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 3.1%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 25.34

Nicht bestanden (7)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • ROIC 1.7%
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • ROE 1.2%
  • Share Dilution 50.7%
  • Piotroski F-Score 3/9

Nicht verfügbar (9)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Price below Graham Number
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Net Margin Trend (invalid data)

Piotroski F-Score

3/9

Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

25.34

Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt

Aktienverwässerung

50.7%

Neue Aktien werden ausgegeben, Eigentum wird verwässert

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Mr. Matthew Kaes Van't HofCEO & Director38
Mr. Austen GilfillianPresident32
Mr. Albert BarkmannExecutive VP & Chief Engineer44
Mr. Chip SealeDirector of Investor Relations-
Mr. Will KruegerVP, General Counsel and Secretary-

Prüfungsrisiko

3

Vorstandsrisiko

3

Vergütungsrisiko

9

Aktionärsrechterisiko

3

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for VNOM, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for VNOM.