Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)
NEUTRALFundamental
64
Kurs
$193.44
Marktkapitalisierung
$24.40B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Verisk collects claims, policy and loss data from nearly every US property-and-casualty insurer, then sells back the analytics, forms and risk models built from that pooled data. It is not an insurer: it never takes on underwriting risk itself. Instead it sits between insurers as a data cooperative of sorts, turning industry-wide information that no single carrier could assemble alone into pricing tools, fraud detection, and the standard policy language much of the industry relies on.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
Most revenue comes from subscriptions: insurers pay recurring fees for continuous access to Verisk's databases, risk scores, and the standardized policy forms and loss-cost filings that regulators and carriers use as a common starting point. Because the underlying data pool grows more valuable as more insurers contribute to it, and because switching away means rebuilding underwriting workflows around a different data source, renewal rates are very high and pricing tends to rise steadily rather than swing with the economy.
Umsatz nach Segment
Data, forms, rating and catastrophe-risk tools that insurers use to decide what to charge and whether to accept a policy in the first place.
Anti-fraud tools, property-damage estimating software and other services insurers use once a policyholder has filed a claim.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Wechselkosten · BreitVerisk's forms, loss-cost filings and risk scores are embedded directly into how insurers price and write policies across nearly the whole US market, and much of that data reflects decades of pooled claims history that cannot be recreated by a new entrant. Replacing Verisk would mean rebuilding core underwriting infrastructure from scratch, which is why customer retention runs close to universal.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
DefensivInsurers need underwriting data and claims tools regardless of the economic cycle, since they must keep pricing and writing policies whether the economy is expanding or not. Revenue is therefore driven more by insurance-industry premium growth, new product adoption and pricing increases than by broader economic swings, making Verisk's business one of the steadier revenue streams among analytics companies.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Regulatory scrutiny of pricing and data use — Insurance regulators periodically scrutinize how widely used rating and loss-cost data shapes pricing across an entire market, and any restriction on how that data can be used or shared would hit a core part of the business.
- Reliance on the health of the P&C insurance industry — Nearly all revenue depends on property-and-casualty insurers continuing to grow and to value third-party data services; consolidation among large carriers could also reduce the number of paying customers.
- Narrower revenue base after divestitures — Verisk sold several non-insurance businesses in recent years to focus on its core Insurance segment, leaving a narrower set of revenue streams than the company had a few years ago.
- Competition and in-house build risk — Large insurers with enough scale can build some of Verisk's analytics internally or turn to smaller specialized data vendors, limiting how much Verisk can raise prices without prompting customers to look elsewhere.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that Verisk's data and workflow tools are so embedded in US insurance pricing that near-universal retention and steady mid-single-digit pricing power should continue for years, and that the pure-play Insurance focus after recent divestitures makes the business simpler to underwrite.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that regulatory attention to concentrated, widely used pricing data could eventually constrain how Verisk monetizes it, that growth is now tied to a single insurance-industry cycle rather than a diversified set of end markets, and that premium valuation multiples leave little room for anything less than flawless execution.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$3.10B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 31.3.2026)
Nettogewinn
$910M
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 31.3.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$1.19B
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$309M
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$5.89B
Current Ratio
1.02
Zinsdeckungsgrad
7.68
Schulden/EBITDA
2.89
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$196.73
Aktueller Kurs
$193.44
Sicherheitsmarge
+1.7%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$149.77 - $243.70
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
28.89
ROE
293.9%
P/B-Verhältnis
79.50
P/FCF
22.03
Bruttomarge
70.0%
ROIC
31.6%
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
31.6%
WACC
7.4%
ROIC − WACC
+24.2 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (19)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 14.92%
- Price CAGR 8.73%
- ROIC 31.6%
- Gross Margin 70.0%
- P/FCF 22.03
- Operating Margin 44.0%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current Ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- ROE 324.3%
- Analyst Consensus 62% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 3.3%
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.52
- Share Dilution -1.8%
- Piotroski F-Score 7/9
Nicht bestanden (8)
- P/B Ratio 79.50
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Revenue Growth 5Y 2.0%
- PEG Ratio 3.15
- Net Margin Trend 29.3% vs 33.1%
Nicht verfügbar (1)
- Dividend Payout NaN%
Piotroski F-Score
Starke finanzielle Gesundheit
Gewinnqualität
Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Lee M. Shavel | CEO, President & Director | 58 |
| Ms. Elizabeth D. Mann | Executive VP & CFO | 49 |
| Ms. Kathlyn Card Beckles | Executive VP & Chief Legal Officer | 50 |
| Ms. Sunita Bhatia Holzer | Executive VP & Chief Human Resources Officer | 63 |
| Mr. Nicholas Daffan | Strategic Advisor | 55 |
| Mr. David J. Grover | Controller & Chief Accounting Officer | 53 |
| Mr. Jeff Negrete | CTO & Interim Chief Information Officer | - |
| Ms. Stacey Jill Brodbar | Senior Vice President of Finance & Investor Relations | - |
| Ms. Yang Chen | Head of Corporate Development & Strategy | - |
| Ms. Melissa Hendricks | Chief Marketing Officer | - |
Prüfungsrisiko
2
Vorstandsrisiko
5
Vergütungsrisiko
3
Aktionärsrechterisiko
6
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for VRSK, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 2/23/2026POSITIVEVerisk Initiates $1.5 Billion Accelerated Stock Buyback
Verisk Analytics Inc. has initiated a significant $1.5 billion accelerated share repurchase (ASR) program. This strategic move, involving agreements with several financial institutions, is a clear signal of management's confidence in the company's financial health and long-term growth prospects. By reducing the number of outstanding shares, the buyback aims to increase earnings per share (EPS), creating direct value for shareholders. The operation is supported by the company's strong cash flow generation, as reaffirmed in the announcement. For investors, this initiative not only suggests that management believes the stock is undervalued at current prices but also demonstrates a tangible commitment to returning capital, making Verisk a potentially more attractive asset in the data analytics and risk management sector.
via Markets Gazette