Volver a la clasificación

Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)

POSITIVE
Communication ServicesAdvertising AgenciesUnited States

Fundamental

73

Precio

$24.08

Capitalización Bursátil

$3.38B

Parte 1 · Cuánto vale la empresa

Resumen

Magnite is a sell-side advertising technology company: it builds the software that digital publishers use to sell their ad space automatically. The company describes itself as the world's largest independent omni-channel sell-side platform (SSP) and the largest independent programmatic marketplace for Connected TV (CTV) — ads shown inside streaming services on internet-connected televisions. When a viewer opens a streaming app, a mobile app or a web page, the publisher sends an ad request to Magnite's platform; Magnite passes it to buyers (advertisers, agencies and demand-side platforms), runs an auction in milliseconds, and the winning bid becomes the ad the viewer sees. Its SpringServe platform combines a CTV ad server with the streaming marketplace, and tools such as ClearLine and the Magnite Curator Marketplace let buyers assemble custom inventory packages. The word 'independent' matters here: Magnite owns no media of its own and runs no demand-side platform, so it does not compete with the publishers it serves — unlike the 'walled gardens' (Google, Amazon, Meta, Comcast) it names as its main competitors. Revenue was $713.95 million in fiscal 2025, with net income of $144.6 million against an accumulated deficit of $516.6 million.

Cómo genera ingresos

Magnite is paid by the publisher every time an impression is monetised on its platform. The fee is normally a percentage of the advertising spend the publisher collects — the 'take rate' — so revenue is recognised net, not on the gross advertising spend that flows through the marketplace. The filing states that only 10% of 2025 revenue was reported on a gross basis (down from 14% in 2024 and 18% in 2023), a share that keeps shrinking as the managed-service business gives way to fully automated buying. For some clients, services or transaction types — ad serving in particular — Magnite instead charges a fixed CPM per thousand impressions sold, and it may also collect fixed monthly platform fees. The take rate is not uniform: the company discloses that it is lower on reserve auctions than on open auctions with several bidders, lower on CTV than on other channels, higher on managed service, and that it may be negotiated down for very large sellers. Buyers are generally invoiced monthly, with payment terms of seventy-five days or less.

Ingresos por segmento

CTV (Connected TV)48%

Advertising transactions delivered to viewers on an internet-connected television set — streaming services, broadcaster apps, platforms and device makers. Magnite sells the SpringServe ad server and marketplace to these streaming publishers and connects them to brand advertisers and DSPs. CTV revenue grew 9% in 2025 and the company expects it to be its biggest growth driver.

Mobile (part of DV+)37%

Advertising delivered to devices running a mobile operating system — smartphones and tablets, inside apps and on the mobile web. Together with desktop it forms what Magnite calls the DV+ business. Mobile revenue grew 7% in 2025.

Desktop (part of DV+)15%

Advertising delivered to PCs and laptops, plus tablets not running a mobile operating system — largely display and video on websites, monetised through header bidding and the Demand Manager tool. It is the mature, slowest-moving part of the business: desktop revenue rose just 1% in 2025.

Ventaja competitiva

Efectos de red · Estrecha

Magnite runs a two-sided marketplace, and the filing describes the resulting self-reinforcing loop explicitly: a large and diverse pool of sellers attracts more buyers, which attracts more sellers, while every additional impression feeds the machine-learning and bid-filtering systems that improve matching. In CTV the position is reinforced by switching costs, because SpringServe is not just an auction but the publisher's ad server, embedded in how a streamer runs its commercial breaks — ad podding, dynamic insertion for live events, audio normalisation, frequency capping, creative review. Independence is a genuine selling point too: Magnite owns no content and operates no demand-side platform, so it can position itself as unconflicted with its publishers. But the advantage should be read as narrow rather than wide. The company acknowledges that its contracts are generally non-exclusive, carry no minimum volumes and can be terminated on short notice; that DSPs increasingly go direct to publishers; that take rates are under pressure and lower in CTV, the very channel that is growing; and that Google, Amazon, Meta and Comcast are far larger, own their own media and hold data Magnite cannot match.

Qué impulsa la demanda

Cíclico

Magnite sits directly on top of advertising budgets, which are among the first line items companies cut in a downturn and among the first they restore in a recovery. The filing says plainly that revenue and operating results are highly dependent on overall demand for advertising and that macroeconomic challenges may adversely affect the business. On top of the economic cycle there is a pronounced calendar cycle: the company states that many buyers devote a disproportionate share of their budgets to the fourth quarter to coincide with holiday purchasing, and that it expects revenue, cash flow and its other key measures to be higher in Q4 than in other quarters. The managed-service business is described as especially variable, since it is tied to one-off or seasonal campaigns and discretionary budgets rather than recurring revenue. What partly offsets the cycle is a structural tailwind the company sees running for years: the migration of viewing and of advertising money from linear television to ad-supported streaming, and from manual to programmatic buying.

Riesgos clave

  • A handful of buyers account for a disproportionate share of the business — The company discloses that in 2025 two buyers of advertising inventory indirectly contributed roughly 44% of revenue through their buying activity from sellers on the platform. It warns that losing a major DSP source of demand could reduce bid density and pricing in its auctions, that the number of large media buyers and sellers is finite, and that such losses would be hard to replace.
  • Contracts are non-exclusive and can be cancelled at short notice — Agreements with buyers and sellers are generally not exclusive, may be terminated upon relatively short notice, and generally do not require minimum volumes or long-term commitments. If buyers or sellers representing a significant portion of demand or inventory materially reduced their use of the platform, the company says it could see an immediate and significant decline in revenue and profitability.
  • Take rates may fall even if spend on the platform rises — The fee Magnite keeps varies by publisher and transaction type: it is lower on reserve auctions than on multi-bidder auctions, lower on CTV than on other channels, and higher on the managed-service business that the company expects to keep shrinking. Large sellers may also negotiate lower rates. The company states that any decrease in take rate could reduce revenue notwithstanding an increase in the total advertising spend transacted through the platform.
  • Competition from far larger players, and buyers going direct — Magnite states that it operates in an intensely competitive market against companies with greater financial, technical and marketing resources — naming Google, Facebook, Comcast and Amazon — which own their own content, have direct relationships with users and hold vast proprietary data. It also flags that buyers, including DSPs that transact on its platform, are increasingly establishing relationships directly with sellers, which puts significant pressure on it.
  • CTV growth may disappoint or bypass the platform — The company warns that if CTV advertising spend grows more slowly than expected, or grows disproportionately through platforms it cannot access or through CTV sellers that do not use its solution, its operating results and growth prospects could be harmed. It adds that CTV sellers may not adopt, or may be slow to adopt, the biddable auction environments on which its higher take rates depend, and that maintaining access to CTV inventory on acceptable terms may expose it to an increased risk of losses.
  • Advertising demand follows the economy — Revenue and operating results are described as highly dependent on overall demand for advertising, and macroeconomic challenges may adversely affect the business, financial position, results and cash flows. The filing also cites inflation raising its cost base relative to revenue, and the possibility that countries where it operates enact new taxes in response to US tariffs.
  • The end of third-party cookies and the shift in digital identity — Magnite states that if third-party cookies are replaced by alternative tracking mechanisms its performance may decline and it may lose buyers and revenue. It also concedes that its own belief — that the elimination of third-party cookies will lead to greater use of first-party publisher data, to its advantage — may be incorrect.
  • Suing Google, while depending on Google — In September 2025 Magnite filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google in the Eastern District of Virginia. The company notes that Google is both a major partner and a competitor, that a significant portion of its revenue is generated through its relationship with Google, and that the action creates risks including potential retaliatory measures, protracted costs, management distraction, and the possibility that it recovers damages below expectations or none at all.
  • A history of losses, and artificial intelligence as a wild card — Despite net income of $144.6 million in 2025 and $22.8 million in 2024, the company reported a net loss of $159.2 million in 2023 and carried an accumulated deficit of $516.6 million at year end, and it states it may not be able to sustain growth or profitability. Separately, it warns that advances in AI may negatively affect the digital advertising market, that failure to build AI features into its platform could hurt results, that it may be ineffective at using AI for internal efficiencies, and that the regulatory landscape for AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving.

Concentración de clientes

Los principales clientes representan el 44% de los ingresos

The concentration sits on the buy side, not the sell side. Magnite discloses that in 2025 two buyers of advertising inventory indirectly contributed approximately 44% of revenue through their buying activity from sellers on the platform. On the sell side, from which revenue is contractually recognised, no single seller of advertising inventory accounted for 10% or more of revenue in 2025, 2024 or 2023 — though one seller represented 27% of accounts payable and accrued expenses at year-end 2025. Balance-sheet concentration is high in both directions: at 31 December 2025 two buyers accounted for 40% and 12% respectively of net accounts receivable, and the company reminds readers that because revenue is reported net while receivables and payables are gross, both appear large relative to revenue.

Los argumentos a favor

Buyers argue that Magnite is the default independent toll booth on the shift of television advertising to streaming, and that the numbers are starting to show it: revenue of $714.0 million in 2025, up 7% from $668.2 million, with CTV up 9% and now 48% of revenue, and net income of $144.6 million after a $159.2 million loss two years earlier. They point to the self-service model, which the company says lets it scale faster than its sales organisation and produce operating leverage, and to gross profit rising 9% and income from operations nearly doubling to $97.6 million. They emphasise that SpringServe is not merely an auction but the streaming publisher's ad server — embedded in how commercial breaks, live events and creative approvals actually work — and that the 2025 next-generation SpringServe release and the Streamr.ai acquisition, which uses generative AI to let small and regional businesses produce and launch CTV campaigns, widen the advertiser base beyond the big brands. They read independence as an asset that the walled gardens structurally cannot copy, they see the 25% of revenue coming from outside the United States as room to expand, and they treat the antitrust suit filed against Google in September 2025 as optionality the market is not paying for.

Los argumentos en contra

Sellers fear that Magnite is a thin intermediary in a market whose economics are set by others. Its fee is a percentage of somebody else's spend, and the company itself says the take rate is lower on CTV — the channel doing all the growing — lower on reserve auctions, and negotiable downward for the largest sellers, so revenue can lag even when spend on the platform rises. They point to the concentration: two buyers indirectly behind roughly 44% of 2025 revenue, and contracts that are non-exclusive, carry no minimum volumes and can be terminated on short notice. They note that DSPs are increasingly going direct to publishers, cutting out the intermediary altogether, and that Google, Amazon, Meta and Comcast own the content, the users and the data that Magnite does not. They read the two slow channels — mobile up 7%, desktop up 1% — as a maturing base that leaves the whole story resting on CTV, and they observe that the company itself warns CTV spend may grow through platforms it cannot access. They add the balance-sheet items: an accumulated deficit of $516.6 million, convertible senior notes whose conversion would dilute existing holders, and covenants under the credit agreement. Finally they see the Google lawsuit as cutting both ways, since a significant portion of Magnite's revenue is generated through the relationship with the company it is suing, and Magnite itself flags the risk of retaliation.

Datos por segmento del ejercicio fiscal 2025Fuentes: Magnite, Inc. — Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

Generated on 23 de agosto de 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 23 de agosto de 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 8.7Score: 72Market cap: $55.74B

Magnite's 10-K names Comcast as a larger competitor: its FreeWheel unit sells ad serving and monetization to the same broadcasters and streaming platforms, exactly where Magnite's CTV revenue comes from.

P/E: 21.1Score: 71Market cap: $2.83T

Cited in Magnite's 10-K as one of the far larger rivals, Amazon Publisher Services monetizes third-party publisher and streaming inventory, taking the same supply-side role Magnite is paid for.

PubMatic, Inc.PUBM

PubMatic is the other listed independent sell-side platform, bidding for the same publishers' display, video and CTV inventory and earning the same take rate on each impression sold.

Alphabet Inc. (Google Ad Manager)GOOGL

Named first among competitors in Magnite's 10-K, Google Ad Manager is the ad server and exchange used by roughly three publishers out of four and holds about 60% of the market Magnite sells into.

Index Exchange, Inc.Not tracked

Index Exchange is a privately held independent exchange competing for the same publisher integrations and the same programmatic auctions in display and video.

OpenX Technologies, Inc.Not tracked

OpenX is a private independent supply-side platform used by about a third of publishers, competing with Magnite for the same premium web and CTV inventory.

Balance y Liquidez

Ingresos

$742M

Últimos 12 meses (hasta 30/6/2026)

Beneficio Neto

$167M

Últimos 12 meses (hasta 30/6/2026)

Flujo de Caja Libre

$166M

Patrimonio Neto Total

$922M

Pasivo Total

$2.24B

Ratio de Liquidez

1.03

Cobertura de Intereses

5.93

Deuda/EBITDA

2.76

Beneficio Por Acción

Ingresos y Beneficio Neto

Flujo de Caja Libre

Desglose de Ingresos

Estado histórico

Márgenes en el tiempo

La deuda en el tiempo

Cuánto pesa la deuda

Cuadro de crecimiento

Crecimiento — Ingresos

Estimación de Valor Justo

Sobrevalorado

Valor Justo

$18.49

Precio Actual

$24.08

Margen de Seguridad

-30.2%

Rango de Valor Justo

$12.02 - $24.97

Métodos de Estimación

Analyst Target:$27.33
DCF:$12.49
PE-based:$17.88
Graham Growth:$17.91
EPV:$3.56
Consenso de Analistas:Compra Fuerte (19B / 3H / 0S)
Última Sorpresa de Resultados:+2.48%

Métricas de Valoración

Ratio P/E

21.42

ROE

15.7%

Ratio P/B

3.61

P/FCF

15.66

Margen Bruto

64.8%

ROIC

6.9%

Radar de Rentabilidad

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

6.9%

WACC

16.0%

ROIC − WACC

-9.1 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Criterios de Análisis Fundamental

Superado (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 12.22%
  • ROIC 6.9%
  • Gross Margin 64.8%
  • P/FCF 15.66
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 15.6%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 18.6%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 26.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 86% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 4.5%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.68
  • Net Margin Trend 22.5% vs 6.3%
  • Piotroski F-Score 6/9

Fallido (6)

  • P/B Ratio 3.61
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Share Dilution 6.9%

No disponible (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

6/9

Señales mixtas: algunas áreas requieren atención

score
criteria

Calidad de los Beneficios

1.68

Alta calidad: beneficios respaldados por efectivo

Dilución de Acciones

6.9%

Emitiendo nuevas acciones, diluyendo la participación

Gobernanza

Equipo Directivo

NombreCargoEdad
Mr. Michael G. BarrettCEO & Director63
Mr. David L. DayChief Financial Officer64
Ms. Katie EvansPresident of Product & Operations39
Mr. Sean Patrick BuckleyPresident of Revenue & Market Strategy36
Mr. Brian GephartChief Accounting Officer45
Mr. David BuonaseraChief Technology Officer38
Mr. Nick KormelukVP of Investor Relations & Head of Global Real Estate-
Mr. Aaron Saltz J.D.Chief Legal Officer44
Ms. Shawna Hughes CPAChief People Officer47
Mr. Yael MilbankManaging Director of Australia & New Zealand-

Riesgo de Auditoría

1

Riesgo del Consejo

2

Riesgo de Compensación

3

Riesgo de Derechos del Accionista

5

Parte 2 · El precio y el momento de entrar

Esta parte no sirve para saber si la empresa vale: sirve para elegir cuándo comprarla, una vez que los fundamentales te han convencido. Dentro: análisis técnico, potencial, caídas históricas, exposición gamma.

Latest News

Recent headlines for MGNI, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 3/10/2026NEGATIVE
    Fund Slashes Magnite Stake by $13 Million as Ad Tech Firm Posts $714 Million Revenue Year

    A significant fund has divested $13 million of its stake in ad tech firm Magnite Inc. This move comes as Magnite reported annual revenue of $714 million, a figure that has evidently not satisfied the fund's investment criteria or outlook. Magnite's business, which bridges digital publishers and ad buyers in connected TV and online media, faces a challenging advertising landscape. The substantial sell-off by an institutional investor signals potential concerns about the company's future growth prospects or profitability, which could weigh on the stock price.

  • 3/5/2026POSITIVE
    This Fund Built a Nearly $40 Million Stake in Magnite Stock as Shares Plunged 25% Last Quarter

    A major investment fund has built a nearly $40 million stake in Magnite Inc. (MGNI) over the last quarter, a period during which the company's shares plunged 25%. This strategic move, despite the recent stock decline, suggests strong conviction from the investor in Magnite's recovery potential and proprietary technology as a digital advertising platform enabling publishers across CTV, apps, and digital media. The substantial investment indicates the fund believes the stock is undervalued and poised for a rebound, offering a signal of confidence to other market participants.

  • 3/4/2026POSITIVE
    Magnite Stock Tanked 25% Last Quarter, but This Fund Still Bought Up $3 Million More in Shares

    Despite Magnite's stock falling 25% last quarter, an investment fund increased its stake by buying an additional $3 million worth of shares. Magnite operates a leading platform connecting digital publishers with advertisers across connected TV and digital media channels. This significant purchase by an institutional investor, despite the recent negative performance, suggests strong conviction in Magnite's recovery potential and business model resilience. For investors, this signal indicates the market might be undervaluing the company's future prospects.

  • 2/25/2026NEUTRAL
    Magnite (MGNI) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

    Magnite Inc. (MGNI) held its Q4 2025 earnings conference call to discuss its financial performance. While this is a standard event for investors monitoring company health, specific details and projections discussed during the call are not yet publicly available. The absence of the full transcript prevents an immediate analysis of revenue trends, earnings per share, or future guidance. Market participants are keenly awaiting the release of the minutes to assess the impact on the stock's outlook, particularly within the evolving digital advertising market.

  • 2/20/2026NEUTRAL
    Price Over Earnings Overview: Magnite

    The news provides an overview of Magnite's price relative to its earnings, without offering specific details on financial performance or recent events that could impact the stock. Therefore, the market impact is considered neutral due to the lack of further information.

via Markets Gazette