Insmed Incorporated (INSM)
NEUTRALFondamental
43
Prix
$123.46
Capitalisation boursière
$27.47B
Partie 1 · Ce que vaut l'entreprise
Vue d'ensemble
Insmed is a biopharmaceutical company that develops drugs for rare lung and inflammatory diseases with no or few approved treatments. Its first product, ARIKAYCE, is an inhaled antibiotic for a chronic lung infection caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. In August 2025 it launched a second product, BRINSUPRI (brensocatib), the first approved treatment for bronchiectasis, a disease that damages the airways and had no dedicated drug until then. Both are chronic therapies patients take on an ongoing basis rather than a single course.
Comment l'entreprise gagne de l'argent
Insmed books revenue when specialty pharmacies and distributors take delivery of product, net of rebates and discounts negotiated with payors. Both drugs are priced as specialty medicines for rare or underserved diseases, so a relatively small number of patients generates meaningful revenue per prescription. BRINSUPRI is only months into its launch, so 2025 revenue reflects a partial year; the company has guided to roughly a billion dollars of BRINSUPRI sales in 2026 as prescribing ramps.
Chiffre d'affaires par segment
Inhaled antibiotic for nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease, Insmed's original and still-largest product.
First approved treatment for bronchiectasis, launched in August 2025 and still ramping toward a much larger patient population.
Avantage concurrentiel
Brevets et licences · ÉtroitBoth drugs are protected by patents and by the years of clinical development it takes to prove a therapy safe and effective in a rare disease, which discourages new entrants. The moat is narrow rather than wide: orphan-drug status and regulatory exclusivity are time-limited, and competitors are actively developing rival treatments for the same conditions.
Ce qui stimule la demande
DéfensifBoth drugs treat chronic, serious lung conditions that patients and physicians do not defer because of the economy: once diagnosed, treatment is a medical necessity rather than a discretionary purchase, and it is largely paid for by insurance. Demand instead depends on diagnosis rates, physician awareness of a still-new disease category, and payor willingness to reimburse at the price set.
Principaux risques
- Dependence on two products — Nearly all revenue comes from ARIKAYCE and the newly launched BRINSUPRI. Any manufacturing problem, safety signal or competitive setback affecting either drug would have an outsized effect on the company.
- Reimbursement and pricing risk — Revenue depends on government and private payors continuing to cover both drugs at prices that support the business; unfavorable reimbursement decisions could reduce prescribing or force price concessions.
- Reliance on third-party manufacturing — Insmed relies on outside manufacturers and suppliers to produce its drugs; a disruption at one of them could interrupt supply of a product for which there may be no immediate substitute.
- Market acceptance of a new therapy — BRINSUPRI treats a disease that had no approved drug before it; how quickly physicians diagnose and prescribe for a newly defined market is uncertain and central to the 2026 growth the company has guided to.
Les arguments en faveur
Buyers argue that BRINSUPRI opens an entirely new, underdiagnosed disease category with no approved competitor, that ARIKAYCE still has room to grow as awareness spreads, and that a company moving from single-product to two-product commercial scale is closer to sustained profitability than its history suggests.
Les arguments contre
Sellers worry that BRINSUPRI's launch trajectory could fall short of the roughly billion-dollar 2026 guidance if diagnosis and prescribing ramp more slowly than hoped, that rival companies are racing to develop competing bronchiectasis treatments, and that a business still built on two drugs remains fragile to a single setback in either one.
Written by the editors, published on 18 août 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Bilan & Liquidités
Chiffre d'affaires
$1.14B
12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)
Résultat net
$-875M
12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)
Flux de trésorerie libre
$-968M
Capitaux propres totaux
$739M
Passif total
$1.53B
Ratio de liquidité général
3.72
Couverture des intérêts
10.34
Dette/EBITDA
-
Bénéfice par action
Chiffre d'affaires & Résultat net
Flux de trésorerie libre
Décomposition du résultat
État historique
Marges dans le temps
La dette dans le temps
Le poids de la dette
Grille de la croissance
Croissance — Chiffre d'affaires
Estimation de la juste valeur
Juste valeur
$200.05
Prix actuel
$123.46
Marge de sécurité
+38.3%
Fourchette de juste valeur
$190.04 - $210.05
Méthodes d'estimation
Indicateurs de valorisation
Ratio P/E
-
ROE
-172.8%
Ratio P/B
35.74
P/FCF
-
Marge brute
83.5%
ROIC
-39.9%
Radar de rentabilité
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
-39.9%
WACC
9.1%
ROIC − WACC
-49.0 pp
ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.
Critères d'analyse fondamentale
Réussi (9)
- Price CAGR 25.26%
- Gross Margin 83.5%
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Current Ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Revenue Growth 5Y 29.8%
- Analyst Consensus 97% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 17.4%
- Net Margin Trend -76.9% vs -259.8%
Échoué (11)
- EPS shows upward trend
- ROIC -39.9%
- P/B Ratio 35.74
- Operating Margin -73.9%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- DCF valuation (Unknown)
- ROE -111.3%
- Share Dilution 21.2%
- Piotroski F-Score 4/9
Indisponible (7)
- P/FCF NaN
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- CapEx intensity
- Debt/EBITDA
- Price below Graham Number
- PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
- Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
Score F de Piotroski
Signaux mixtes : certains domaines nécessitent attention
Qualité des bénéfices
Qualité faible : examiner la comptabilité
Dilution du capital
Émission de nouvelles actions, diluant la participation
Gouvernance
Équipe dirigeante
| Nom | Titre | Âge |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. William H. Lewis J.D., M.B.A. | President, CEO & Chairman | 56 |
| Ms. Sara M. Bonstein M.B.A. | Chief Financial Officer | 44 |
| Mr. Roger Adsett M.B.A. | Chief Operating Officer | 56 |
| Mr. Michael Alexander Smith J.D. | Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary | 47 |
| Dr. Martina Flammer M.B.A., M.D. | Chief Medical Officer | 61 |
| Mr. Brian K. Kaspar Ph.D. | Chief Scientific Officer | 51 |
| Bryan Dunn | Vice President of Investor Relations | - |
| Ms. Christie Camelio | Chief Compliance Officer | - |
| Ms. Claire Mulhearn | Vice President of Corporate Communications | - |
| Ms. S. Nicole Schaeffer M.B.A. | Chief People Strategy Officer | 57 |
Risque d'audit
5
Risque du conseil
4
Risque de rémunération
6
Risque droits des actionnaires
9
Partie 2 · Le prix et le moment d'entrer
Cette partie ne dit pas si l'entreprise vaut la peine : elle aide à choisir quand l'acheter, une fois que les fondamentaux vous ont convaincu. À l'intérieur : analyse technique, potentiel, baisses historiques, exposition gamma.
Latest News
Recent headlines for INSM, sourced from Markets Gazette.