Retour au classement

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)

POSITIVE
TechnologySemiconductorsUnited States

Fondamental

68

Prix

$1302.88

Capitalisation boursière

$63.15B

Partie 1 · Ce que vaut l'entreprise

Vue d'ensemble

Monolithic Power Systems designs power-management chips: the small components that convert and regulate electricity inside servers, cars, phones and industrial equipment. Like NVIDIA, it is fabless — it designs the chips and has outside foundries manufacture them — so its edge comes from engineering rather than factories. What began as a supplier of chips for laptop and monitor power circuits now sells increasingly into AI data-center power delivery, the fastest-growing part of its business.

Comment l'entreprise gagne de l'argent

Revenue comes from selling chips to equipment makers, either directly or through distributors, recognized when the customer takes delivery — there are no subscriptions. Because MPS designs rather than manufactures, and its chips replace several older components with one, it can charge a premium over commodity power parts while keeping costs mostly to research and foundry capacity. The heaviest growth driver is the amount of power-delivery silicon each AI server rack now requires, far higher than in a conventional server.

Chiffre d'affaires par segment

Storage and Computing26.3%

Power chips for memory, storage drives, notebooks and graphics cards — the largest end market.

Enterprise Data25.2%

Power-delivery chips sold directly into AI servers and data-center racks — the segment tied most closely to AI infrastructure spending.

Automotive21.2%

Power management for infotainment, lighting and driver-assistance systems sold to carmakers and their suppliers.

Communications11.1%

Power solutions for optical modules, routers and networking equipment used to build communications infrastructure.

Consumer9.1%

Chips used in televisions, home appliances and other consumer electronics.

Industrial7.1%

Power components sold into industrial and instrumentation equipment, the smallest end market.

Avantage concurrentiel

Coûts de changement · Étroit

Once an engineer designs an MPS chip into a car, server or phone, replacing it means re-qualifying a new part through months of testing — a cost few customers take on for a component that is a small fraction of the total bill of materials. That gives MPS pricing power on existing designs, but it must still win the next design cycle against larger rivals like Texas Instruments and Analog Devices from scratch.

Ce qui stimule la demande

Cyclique

Demand mixes a cyclical core — automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production rise and fall with the broader economy — with a newer, even more concentrated driver: how much AI server capacity a handful of hyperscalers decide to build. That second driver has been the main source of recent growth, which makes results more dependent on a few large customers' capital budgets than the older, more diversified business was.

Principaux risques

  • Concentration in a few AI infrastructure customers — Growth in the largest and fastest-growing segment depends on continued capital spending by a small number of very large data-center operators, whose plans can change without warning.
  • Design-win competition from larger rivals — Texas Instruments, Analog Devices and other larger analog chipmakers compete for the same design sockets, and losing a design cycle can mean years without that customer's business.
  • Dependence on outside foundries — MPS owns no fabrication plants and relies on contract manufacturers for wafers and packaging, so capacity shortages or supplier disruption limit how much it can ship.
  • Cyclical end markets — Automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production all slow in a weaker economy, and inventory corrections at customers have caused sharp swings in orders before.

Concentration des clients

MPS does not disclose individual customer names or percentages, but the Enterprise Data segment — its fastest-growing — is concentrated around a small number of AI computing customers, making that growth more fragile than the automotive or industrial businesses.

Les arguments en faveur

Buyers argue that each new generation of AI servers needs more power-delivery silicon than the last, that MPS's design-win model locks in revenue once a chip is chosen, and that Storage/Computing and Enterprise Data growth show the company capturing a disproportionate share of that buildout.

Les arguments contre

Sellers fear that the AI-driven growth rests on a handful of customers who could qualify a competing chip or slow their own capital spending, that automotive and industrial end markets remain cyclical, and that larger rivals with deeper resources will eventually contest the design wins MPS has won.

Written by the editors, published on 18 août 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Bilan & Liquidités

Chiffre d'affaires

$3.27B

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Résultat net

$802M

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Flux de trésorerie libre

$666M

Capitaux propres totaux

$3.53B

Passif total

$663M

Ratio de liquidité général

4.98

Couverture des intérêts

-

Dette/EBITDA

0.02

Bénéfice par action

Chiffre d'affaires & Résultat net

Flux de trésorerie libre

Décomposition du résultat

État historique

Marges dans le temps

La dette dans le temps

Le poids de la dette

Grille de la croissance

Croissance — Chiffre d'affaires

Estimation de la juste valeur

Justement valorisé

Juste valeur

$1124.29

Prix actuel

$1302.88

Marge de sécurité

-15.9%

Fourchette de juste valeur

$730.79 - $1517.79

Méthodes d'estimation

Analyst Target:$1842.64
DCF:$467.49
PE-based:$780.75
Graham Growth:$846.85
EPV:$108.30
Consensus des analystes:Achat fort (19B / 4H / 0S)
Dernière surprise sur les résultats:+8.63%

Indicateurs de valorisation

Ratio P/E

78.45

ROE

17.6%

Ratio P/B

16.21

P/FCF

107.85

Marge brute

55.2%

ROIC

17.7%

Radar de rentabilité

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

17.7%

WACC

13.9%

ROIC − WACC

+3.8 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Critères d'analyse fondamentale

Réussi (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 21.91%
  • Price CAGR 32.01%
  • ROIC 17.7%
  • Gross Margin 55.2%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 28.7%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 21.9%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 27.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 83% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 2.5%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.03
  • Share Dilution -1.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Échoué (7)

  • P/FCF 107.85
  • P/B Ratio 16.21
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • PEG Ratio 2.92
  • Net Margin Trend 24.5% vs 65.6%

Indisponible (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage

Score F de Piotroski

7/9

Santé financière solide

score
criteria

Qualité des bénéfices

1.03

Qualité élevée : bénéfices soutenus par la trésorerie

Dilution du capital

-1.0%

Rachat d'actions. Favorable aux actionnaires

Gouvernance

Équipe dirigeante

NomTitreÂge
Mr. Michael R. HsingFounder, Chairman, President & CEO65
Mr. Deming XiaoExecutive Vice President of Global Operations62
Ms. Saria TsengEVP of Strategic Corporate Development, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary54
Mr. Maurice SciammasExecutive Vice President of Worldwide Sales & Marketing65
Mr. Robert W. Dean IIInterim Chief Financial Officer60
Ms. Genevieve CunninghamSenior Manager of Marketing Communications-
Mr. Tony BalowVice President of Finance-
Arthur LeeFinance Manager-

Risque d'audit

10

Risque du conseil

8

Risque de rémunération

4

Risque droits des actionnaires

9

Partie 2 · Le prix et le moment d'entrer

Cette partie ne dit pas si l'entreprise vaut la peine : elle aide à choisir quand l'acheter, une fois que les fondamentaux vous ont convaincu. À l'intérieur : analyse technique, potentiel, baisses historiques, exposition gamma.

Latest News

Recent headlines for MPWR, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 6/15/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much $1000 Invested In Monolithic Power Systems 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $1000 in Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) five years ago would have grown to approximately $4,790 today, representing a significant return of 379%. This performance outpaces the broader market and highlights the company's strong growth trajectory and investor appeal. MPWR's consistent revenue increases and expanding market share in the power management semiconductor sector have been key drivers. Investors considering the stock should note its historical performance as an indicator of potential future gains, though past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

via Markets Gazette