Retour au classement

BeiGene, Ltd. (ONC)

POSITIVE
HealthcareBiotechnologySwitzerland

Fondamental

71

Prix

$379.00

Capitalisation boursière

$42.36B

Partie 1 · Ce que vaut l'entreprise

Vue d'ensemble

ONC trades under BeOne Medicines, formerly known as BeiGene, a global biotechnology company that discovers, develops and sells cancer drugs. Its lead product, Brukinsa, treats certain blood cancers by blocking an enzyme (BTK) the cancer cells need to survive. Unlike a diversified pharmaceutical company, BeOne's revenue and value are concentrated in a small number of approved oncology drugs sold through its own commercial teams in the United States, Europe and China.

Comment l'entreprise gagne de l'argent

Almost all revenue comes from product sales of approved drugs, chiefly Brukinsa, plus smaller in-licensed products such as Amgen's oncology portfolio that BeOne distributes in China. Because it sells directly rather than relying on royalties from a partner, it captures the full margin on each sale but also carries the cost of its own sales forces across multiple continents, and revenue depends on doctors continuing to prescribe its drugs over rival treatments.

Chiffre d'affaires par segment

BRUKINSA73%

The company's lead BTK-inhibitor drug for blood cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, sold globally and the main driver of growth.

TEVIMBRA13.8%

An immunotherapy antibody used against several solid tumor cancers, the company's second-largest product.

Amgen in-licensed products9.1%

Oncology drugs originally developed by Amgen that BeOne markets and sells in China under a licensing agreement.

Avantage concurrentiel

Brevets et licences · Étroit

Patents on Brukinsa's chemical structure and manufacturing, plus regulatory approvals in dozens of countries, keep generic competitors out for a fixed period, and clinical data showing advantages over the first BTK inhibitor to market support doctor preference. The protection is time-limited by patent expiry and contestable by newer drugs in the same class, so it does not amount to a durable structural barrier.

Ce qui stimule la demande

Défensif

Cancer treatment is not discretionary spending and demand does not track the economic cycle; growth instead depends on winning regulatory approvals for new indications, expanding into new countries, and doctors switching patients from older drugs. The main swing factor is clinical and regulatory success, not the broader economy.

Principaux risques

  • Revenue concentration in a single drug — Brukinsa accounts for roughly three-quarters of revenue; a safety issue, a more effective competing drug, or loss of patent protection would have an outsized effect on the whole company.
  • Dependence on regulatory approvals — Selling a drug in a new country or for a new use requires approval from that country's health regulator, a process that can be delayed, restricted or denied regardless of clinical trial results.
  • Pricing and reimbursement pressure — Government and private payers in every market where the company sells negotiate or set drug prices and reimbursement terms, and unfavorable changes can reduce revenue on approved products without any change to the drug itself.
  • Clinical trial and pipeline risk — Future growth depends on drugs still in clinical trials succeeding and reaching approval; most experimental cancer drugs fail somewhere in that process, and a failure removes an assumed source of future revenue.

Les arguments en faveur

Buyers argue that Brukinsa's clinical data advantages over older BTK inhibitors are winning doctor preference and market share even as the drug class matures, that expansion into Europe and other markets outside the US and China still has room to run, and that the company reaching full-year profitability in 2025 for the first time shows the commercial model scaling.

Les arguments contre

Sellers fear that concentrating three-quarters of revenue in one drug leaves little room for error if a safety signal, a stronger competitor or a reimbursement setback emerges, that US growth has already begun decelerating from its earlier triple-digit pace, and that sustaining growth requires the pipeline to deliver new approvals on a schedule biotech development rarely respects.

Written by the editors, published on 18 août 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Bilan & Liquidités

Chiffre d'affaires

$6.13B

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Résultat net

$656M

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Flux de trésorerie libre

$942M

Capitaux propres totaux

$4.36B

Passif total

$3.83B

Ratio de liquidité général

3.40

Couverture des intérêts

7.97

Dette/EBITDA

2.06

Bénéfice par action

Chiffre d'affaires & Résultat net

Flux de trésorerie libre

Décomposition du résultat

État historique

Marges dans le temps

La dette dans le temps

Le poids de la dette

Grille de la croissance

Croissance — Chiffre d'affaires

Estimation de la juste valeur

Surévalué

Juste valeur

$248.20

Prix actuel

$379.00

Marge de sécurité

-52.7%

Fourchette de juste valeur

$161.33 - $335.07

Méthodes d'estimation

Analyst Target:$433.02
DCF:$9.59
PE-based:$342.07
Graham Growth:$90.84
EPV:$19.12
Consensus des analystes:Achat fort (11B / 1H / 0S)

Indicateurs de valorisation

Ratio P/E

845.41

ROE

6.6%

Ratio P/B

106.27

P/FCF

413.35

Marge brute

88.9%

ROIC

10.3%

Radar de rentabilité

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

10.3%

WACC

11.6%

ROIC − WACC

-1.2 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Critères d'analyse fondamentale

Réussi (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 28.57%
  • ROIC 10.3%
  • Gross Margin 88.9%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 15.1%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 78.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 92% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 16.6%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 2.26
  • Net Margin Trend 10.7% vs -3.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Échoué (6)

  • P/FCF 413.35
  • P/B Ratio 106.27
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • ROE 5.2%
  • Share Dilution 10.1%

Indisponible (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Score F de Piotroski

7/9

Santé financière solide

score
criteria

Qualité des bénéfices

2.26

Qualité élevée : bénéfices soutenus par la trésorerie

Dilution du capital

10.1%

Émission de nouvelles actions, diluant la participation

Gouvernance

Équipe dirigeante

NomTitreÂge
Mr. John V. OylerCo-Founder, Executive Chairman & CEO57
Mr. Wang Lai Ph.D.President and Global Head of Research & Development48
Dr. Xiaodong Wang Ph.D.Co-Chairman of Scientific Advisory Board, Non-Executive Director & Co-Founder62
Mr. Aaron RosenbergChief Financial Officer48
Mr. Chan LeeGeneral Counsel, Senior VP & Corporate Secretary57
Mr. Titus B. BallVP & Chief Accounting Officer51
Mr. Marcello DamianiChief Technology Officer55
Ms. Liza HeapesHead of Investor Relations-
Ms. Eleanor Duff Ph.D.Senior VP & Head of Corporate Communications-
Mr. Graham HardimanGlobal Head of Human Resources-

Partie 2 · Le prix et le moment d'entrer

Cette partie ne dit pas si l'entreprise vaut la peine : elle aide à choisir quand l'acheter, une fois que les fondamentaux vous ont convaincu. À l'intérieur : analyse technique, potentiel, baisses historiques, exposition gamma.

Latest News

Recent headlines for ONC, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for ONC.