Retour au classement

Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM)

NEUTRAL
EnergyOil & Gas MidstreamUnited States

Fondamental

55

Prix

$44.32

Capitalisation boursière

$23.72B

Partie 1 · Ce que vaut l'entreprise

Vue d'ensemble

Viper Energy owns mineral and royalty interests under oil and gas acreage in the Permian Basin, mostly operated by its controlling shareholder Diamondback Energy. It does not drill or operate wells itself: it collects a royalty percentage of the oil, gas and natural gas liquids produced by whoever operates the land, without paying any of the drilling or operating costs.

Comment l'entreprise gagne de l'argent

Revenue is royalty income: a contractual share of the value of oil, gas and natural gas liquids extracted from the acreage underlying its mineral interests, paid by the well operator regardless of who drills. Because it funds none of the drilling, completion or lease operating costs, almost all of that royalty income flows through to cash flow, and the main variables are commodity prices and how fast operators — chiefly Diamondback — drill the acreage.

Avantage concurrentiel

Aucun avantage identifié · Aucun

Oil, gas and natural gas liquids are commodities sold at prevailing market prices Viper does not control. Its advantage is a low-cost structure — no drilling or operating capital at risk — rather than pricing power or a durable barrier competitors cannot replicate by buying comparable acreage.

Ce qui stimule la demande

Cyclique

Royalty income moves with oil and gas prices and with the pace at which operators drill the underlying acreage — both of which swing with the broader commodity cycle and operators' own capital budgets. A slowdown in drilling by Diamondback or other operators reduces future production without Viper being able to do anything about it.

Principaux risques

  • Dependence on operators it does not control — Viper earns nothing from acreage that is not drilled, and it has no say over an operator's pace of drilling, well design or capital budget — including Diamondback's own.
  • Conflicts of interest with the controlling shareholder — Diamondback is simultaneously Viper's largest operator, its controlling shareholder and the counterparty in acreage drop-down acquisitions, creating potential conflicts in how those transactions and operating decisions are priced and timed.
  • Commodity price volatility — Royalty income moves directly with oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, which are set by global supply and demand outside the company's control and can fall sharply and quickly.
  • Geographic concentration in the Permian Basin — Substantially all of Viper's acreage sits in a single basin, so a regional problem — pipeline bottlenecks, water disposal limits, or a local regulatory change — affects nearly the entire portfolio at once.

Concentration des clients

Diamondback Energy, Viper's controlling shareholder, operates roughly 35% of Viper's net royalty acreage, making it by far the largest single operator whose drilling pace determines revenue; the company does not disclose the exact percentage of royalty income tied to Diamondback.

Les arguments en faveur

Buyers argue that a royalty-only model with no drilling or operating costs converts an unusually high share of revenue into free cash flow, that being tied to Diamondback gives Viper visibility into a disciplined operator's development plans, and that further mineral acquisitions can keep growing the acreage base without diluting the cost structure.

Les arguments contre

Sellers fear that dependence on Diamondback's drilling pace and on transactions with the same controlling shareholder concentrates risk in one counterparty, that a sustained drop in oil and gas prices hits royalty income directly with no operating cost buffer to absorb it, and that geographic concentration in a single basin leaves no diversification if a regional bottleneck appears.

Written by the editors, published on 18 août 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Bilan & Liquidités

Chiffre d'affaires

$1.97B

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Résultat net

$59M

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Flux de trésorerie libre

-

Capitaux propres totaux

$4.45B

Passif total

$2.31B

Ratio de liquidité général

6.37

Couverture des intérêts

-

Dette/EBITDA

0.89

Bénéfice par action

Chiffre d'affaires & Résultat net

Flux de trésorerie libre

Décomposition du résultat

État historique

Marges dans le temps

La dette dans le temps

Le poids de la dette

Grille de la croissance

Croissance — Chiffre d'affaires

Estimation de la juste valeur

Justement valorisé

Juste valeur

$55.84

Prix actuel

$44.32

Marge de sécurité

+20.6%

Fourchette de juste valeur

$53.05 - $58.63

Méthodes d'estimation

Analyst Target:$55.84
DCF:-
PE-based:-
Graham Growth:-
EPV:$11.06
Consensus des analystes:Achat fort (24B / 1H / 0S)
Dernière surprise sur les résultats:-8.06%

Indicateurs de valorisation

Ratio P/E

279.15

ROE

-1.5%

Ratio P/B

1.73

P/FCF

-

Marge brute

-

ROIC

1.7%

Radar de rentabilité

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

1.7%

WACC

7.3%

ROIC − WACC

-5.6 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Critères d'analyse fondamentale

Réussi (11)

  • Price CAGR 10.96%
  • P/B Ratio 1.73
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 12.7%
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 41.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 96% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 3.1%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 25.34

Échoué (7)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • ROIC 1.7%
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • ROE 1.2%
  • Share Dilution 50.7%
  • Piotroski F-Score 3/9

Indisponible (9)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Price below Graham Number
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Net Margin Trend (invalid data)

Score F de Piotroski

3/9

Préoccupations financières sérieuses

score
criteria

Qualité des bénéfices

25.34

Qualité élevée : bénéfices soutenus par la trésorerie

Dilution du capital

50.7%

Émission de nouvelles actions, diluant la participation

Gouvernance

Équipe dirigeante

NomTitreÂge
Mr. Matthew Kaes Van't HofCEO & Director38
Mr. Austen GilfillianPresident32
Mr. Albert BarkmannExecutive VP & Chief Engineer44
Mr. Chip SealeDirector of Investor Relations-
Mr. Will KruegerVP, General Counsel and Secretary-

Risque d'audit

3

Risque du conseil

3

Risque de rémunération

9

Risque droits des actionnaires

3

Partie 2 · Le prix et le moment d'entrer

Cette partie ne dit pas si l'entreprise vaut la peine : elle aide à choisir quand l'acheter, une fois que les fondamentaux vous ont convaincu. À l'intérieur : analyse technique, potentiel, baisses historiques, exposition gamma.

Latest News

Recent headlines for VNOM, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for VNOM.