Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)
POSITIVEFundamental
68
Preço
$1309.00
Capitalização de Mercado
$63.15B
Parte 1 · Quanto vale a empresa
Visão Geral
Monolithic Power Systems designs power-management chips: the small components that convert and regulate electricity inside servers, cars, phones and industrial equipment. Like NVIDIA, it is fabless — it designs the chips and has outside foundries manufacture them — so its edge comes from engineering rather than factories. What began as a supplier of chips for laptop and monitor power circuits now sells increasingly into AI data-center power delivery, the fastest-growing part of its business.
Como gera receita
Revenue comes from selling chips to equipment makers, either directly or through distributors, recognized when the customer takes delivery — there are no subscriptions. Because MPS designs rather than manufactures, and its chips replace several older components with one, it can charge a premium over commodity power parts while keeping costs mostly to research and foundry capacity. The heaviest growth driver is the amount of power-delivery silicon each AI server rack now requires, far higher than in a conventional server.
Receita por segmento
Power chips for memory, storage drives, notebooks and graphics cards — the largest end market.
Power-delivery chips sold directly into AI servers and data-center racks — the segment tied most closely to AI infrastructure spending.
Power management for infotainment, lighting and driver-assistance systems sold to carmakers and their suppliers.
Power solutions for optical modules, routers and networking equipment used to build communications infrastructure.
Chips used in televisions, home appliances and other consumer electronics.
Power components sold into industrial and instrumentation equipment, the smallest end market.
Vantagem competitiva
Custos de mudança · EstreitaOnce an engineer designs an MPS chip into a car, server or phone, replacing it means re-qualifying a new part through months of testing — a cost few customers take on for a component that is a small fraction of the total bill of materials. That gives MPS pricing power on existing designs, but it must still win the next design cycle against larger rivals like Texas Instruments and Analog Devices from scratch.
O que impulsiona a procura
CíclicoDemand mixes a cyclical core — automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production rise and fall with the broader economy — with a newer, even more concentrated driver: how much AI server capacity a handful of hyperscalers decide to build. That second driver has been the main source of recent growth, which makes results more dependent on a few large customers' capital budgets than the older, more diversified business was.
Principais riscos
- Concentration in a few AI infrastructure customers — Growth in the largest and fastest-growing segment depends on continued capital spending by a small number of very large data-center operators, whose plans can change without warning.
- Design-win competition from larger rivals — Texas Instruments, Analog Devices and other larger analog chipmakers compete for the same design sockets, and losing a design cycle can mean years without that customer's business.
- Dependence on outside foundries — MPS owns no fabrication plants and relies on contract manufacturers for wafers and packaging, so capacity shortages or supplier disruption limit how much it can ship.
- Cyclical end markets — Automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production all slow in a weaker economy, and inventory corrections at customers have caused sharp swings in orders before.
Concentração de clientes
MPS does not disclose individual customer names or percentages, but the Enterprise Data segment — its fastest-growing — is concentrated around a small number of AI computing customers, making that growth more fragile than the automotive or industrial businesses.
Os argumentos a favor
Buyers argue that each new generation of AI servers needs more power-delivery silicon than the last, that MPS's design-win model locks in revenue once a chip is chosen, and that Storage/Computing and Enterprise Data growth show the company capturing a disproportionate share of that buildout.
Os argumentos contra
Sellers fear that the AI-driven growth rests on a handful of customers who could qualify a competing chip or slow their own capital spending, that automotive and industrial end markets remain cyclical, and that larger rivals with deeper resources will eventually contest the design wins MPS has won.
Written by the editors, published on 18 de agosto de 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Balanço & Liquidez
Receita
$3.27B
Últimos 12 meses (até 30/06/2026)
Resultado Líquido
$802M
Últimos 12 meses (até 30/06/2026)
Fluxo de Caixa Livre
$666M
Capital Próprio Total
$3.53B
Passivo Total
$663M
Rácio de Liquidez
4.98
Cobertura de Juros
-
Dívida/EBITDA
0.02
Resultados Por Ação
Receita & Resultado Líquido
Fluxo de Caixa Livre
Decomposição dos Resultados
Demonstração histórica
Margens ao longo do tempo
A dívida ao longo do tempo
Quanto pesa a dívida
Grelha do crescimento
Crescimento — Receitas
Estimativa de Valor Justo
Valor Justo
$1124.29
Preço Atual
$1309.00
Margem de Segurança
-16.4%
Intervalo de Valor Justo
$730.79 - $1517.79
Métodos de Estimativa
Métricas de Avaliação
Rácio P/E
78.45
ROE
17.6%
Rácio P/B
16.21
P/FCF
107.85
Margem Bruta
55.2%
ROIC
17.7%
Radar de Rentabilidade
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
17.7%
WACC
13.9%
ROIC − WACC
+3.8 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Critérios de Análise Fundamental
Aprovado (19)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 21.91%
- Price CAGR 32.01%
- ROIC 17.7%
- Gross Margin 55.2%
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 28.7%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- ROE 21.9%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 27.0%
- Analyst Consensus 83% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 2.5%
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.03
- Share Dilution -1.0%
- Piotroski F-Score 7/9
Reprovado (7)
- P/FCF 107.85
- P/B Ratio 16.21
- CapEx intensity
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- PEG Ratio 2.92
- Net Margin Trend 24.5% vs 65.6%
Indisponível (2)
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Interest Coverage
Piotroski F-Score
Saúde financeira sólida
Qualidade dos Resultados
Alta qualidade: resultados respaldados por caixa
Diluição de Ações
A recomprar ações. Favorável ao acionista
Governação
Equipa Executiva
| Nome | Cargo | Idade |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Michael R. Hsing | Founder, Chairman, President & CEO | 65 |
| Mr. Deming Xiao | Executive Vice President of Global Operations | 62 |
| Ms. Saria Tseng | EVP of Strategic Corporate Development, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | 54 |
| Mr. Maurice Sciammas | Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales & Marketing | 65 |
| Mr. Robert W. Dean II | Interim Chief Financial Officer | 60 |
| Ms. Genevieve Cunningham | Senior Manager of Marketing Communications | - |
| Mr. Tony Balow | Vice President of Finance | - |
| Arthur Lee | Finance Manager | - |
Risco de Auditoria
10
Risco do Conselho
8
Risco de Remuneração
4
Risco dos Direitos dos Acionistas
9
Parte 2 · O preço e o momento de entrar
Esta parte não serve para saber se a empresa vale: serve para escolher quando comprá-la, depois que os fundamentos te convenceram. Dentro: análise técnica, potencial, quedas históricas, exposição gama.
Latest News
Recent headlines for MPWR, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 6/15/2026POSITIVEHere's How Much $1000 Invested In Monolithic Power Systems 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today
An investment of $1000 in Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) five years ago would have grown to approximately $4,790 today, representing a significant return of 379%. This performance outpaces the broader market and highlights the company's strong growth trajectory and investor appeal. MPWR's consistent revenue increases and expanding market share in the power management semiconductor sector have been key drivers. Investors considering the stock should note its historical performance as an indicator of potential future gains, though past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
via Markets Gazette