返回排名列表

Teradyne, Inc. (TER)

NEUTRAL
TechnologySemiconductor Equipment & MaterialsUnited States

基本面

67

价格

$366.19

市值

$57.05B

第一部分 · 这家公司值多少

概览

Teradyne makes the automated test equipment chipmakers use to check that every processor and memory chip works before it ships — machines that plug into a finished chip and run it through thousands of checks in seconds. It also makes smaller testers for circuit boards and defense electronics, and, through a separate Robotics division, collaborative robot arms and autonomous mobile robots used on factory floors. It sells machines and the software that runs them, not the chips themselves.

盈利方式

Teradyne sells testing systems as capital equipment: a chipmaker buys a tester as a one-time purchase (plus ongoing service and software fees), sized to how many chips it plans to run through its factories. Because a chipmaker only needs to buy enough testers to cover its production capacity, Teradyne's orders rise sharply when the industry is building new fabs or launching high-volume chips like AI processors, and fall just as sharply once that capacity is in place and utilized.

分部营收

Semiconductor Test79%

Testers for logic, memory and analog chips sold to chipmakers and their contract manufacturers — the core business, driven lately by AI chip demand.

Product Test11%

Smaller testers for circuit boards, defense and aerospace electronics and other non-semiconductor products.

Robotics10%

Collaborative robot arms and autonomous mobile robots sold to factories, a smaller and currently declining division.

护城河

转换成本 · 狭窄

A chipmaker qualifies a specific tester model into its production line only after months of validation, and reprogramming test routines for a new vendor's machine is expensive and slow — so once Teradyne wins a fab, it tends to keep supplying it. The moat is narrow rather than wide because Advantest is a comparably strong rival, particularly in memory testing, and a major customer can and does qualify both.

需求驱动因素

周期性

Orders depend on how much new chip production capacity the industry is building, which moves in sharp cycles: a shortage triggers a wave of new fab investment and tester orders, and the resulting overcapacity then causes orders to collapse until demand catches up again. AI chip demand has driven the current upswing in Semiconductor Test, but the segment has swung from boom to bust before.

主要风险

  • Revenue concentrated in a few large chipmakers — A limited number of large semiconductor customers drive a substantial share of Semiconductor Test purchases, both directly and through their supply partners, so any one customer's slowdown has an outsized effect.
  • Boom-bust capital-spending cycle — Tester orders follow the industry's fab-building cycle, which has swung from shortage to overcapacity within a few quarters before, making Teradyne's near-term order book difficult to predict.
  • Robotics division has struggled to scale — Robotics revenue declined in 2025 on weaker sales of collaborative arms and mobile robots, and the division has yet to prove it can grow reliably alongside the core testing business.
  • Concentrated competition from Advantest — Advantest is a comparably scaled rival, especially in memory testing, and a customer that qualifies both suppliers can shift volume between them based on price or delivery, limiting Teradyne's pricing power.

客户集中度

Teradyne states that a limited number of large customers account for a substantial share of Semiconductor Test purchases, without disclosing an exact percentage; losing one of these customers, or a shift in their capital spending, would be far from a marginal event.

看多理由

Buyers argue that AI chips need more, and more complex, testing than previous generations, that Teradyne's installed base and qualification lock-in keep it the default supplier once a fab is running, and that a Robotics turnaround would add a second growth leg to a business currently driven almost entirely by semiconductor test.

看空理由

Sellers fear that the current AI-driven order wave repeats the industry's past boom-bust pattern, that a handful of large customers hold outsized influence over results, and that Advantest can match Teradyne on price and technology in the segments that matter most, particularly memory testing.

Written by the editors, published on 2026年8月18日

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

资产负债表与流动性

营收

$4.46B

最近12个月(截至2026/6/28)

净利润

$1.15B

最近12个月(截至2026/6/28)

自由现金流

$450M

股东权益合计

$2.80B

负债合计

$1.39B

流动比率

2.12

利息覆盖率

118.77

债务/EBITDA

0.13

每股收益

营收与净利润

自由现金流

收入构成

历史财务表

利润率变化

债务变化

债务负担有多重

增长一览表

增长 — 营业收入

公允价值估算

被高估

公允价值

$235.87

当前价格

$366.19

安全边际

-55.3%

公允价值区间

$153.31 - $318.42

估算方法

Analyst Target:$449.80
DCF:$52.45
PE-based:$257.33
Graham Growth:$54.53
EPV:$47.36
分析师共识:强力买入 (17B / 5H / 0S)
最近财报超预期:+17.01%

估值指标

市盈率(P/E)

50.12

ROE

19.8%

市净率(P/B)

16.60

P/FCF

71.32

毛利率

59.2%

ROIC

28.0%

盈利能力雷达图

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

28.0%

WACC

14.3%

ROIC − WACC

+13.7 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

基本面分析标准

通过(18)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 30.92%
  • ROIC 28.0%
  • Gross Margin 59.2%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 30.2%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 38.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 77% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 18.8%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 0.93
  • Share Dilution -2.3%
  • Net Margin Trend 25.8% vs 16.6%
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

未通过(7)

  • P/FCF 71.32
  • P/B Ratio 16.60
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 0.4%

不可用(2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-评分

5/9

信号混杂:部分领域需关注

score
criteria

盈利质量

0.93

中等:利润与现金之间存在一定差距

股权稀释

-2.3%

正在回购股份,对股东友好

公司治理

管理团队

姓名职位年龄
Mr. Gregory Stephen SmithPresident, CEO & Director61
Ms. Michelle L. TurnerVP, CFO, Treasurer & Principal Accounting Officer51
Mr. Ryan E. DriscollVice President, General Counsel & Secretary47
Mr. Sanjay MehtaExecutive Advisor56
Mr. Shannon John PoulinPresident of Semiconductor Test Division54
Mr. Regan MillsPresident of Product Test Group55
Ms. Shannon GathVP & Chief Information Officer-
Mr. Jim MahonVP & Chief Human Resources Officer-
Mr. Jean-Pierre HathoutPresident of the Teradyne Robotics55
Mr. James DavidsonChief Artificial Intelligence Officer-

审计风险

4

董事会风险

2

薪酬风险

4

股东权利风险

1

第二部分 · 价格与买入时机

这一部分不判断公司是否值得拥有:它帮助你在基本面说服你之后,选择何时买入。包含:技术分析、潜力、历史回撤、Gamma 敞口。

Latest News

Recent headlines for TER, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 6/17/2026POSITIVE
    If You Invested $1000 In Teradyne Stock 10 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

    An investment of $1000 in Teradyne Inc. stock a decade ago would have yielded a significant return, illustrating the company's long-term growth trajectory. While specific figures are not provided in the title, the framing suggests substantial capital appreciation. Teradyne, a key player in the semiconductor testing equipment market, has likely benefited from industry expansion and technological advancements. Investors considering this stock should evaluate its historical performance in conjunction with current market conditions and future industry outlook.

  • 4/24/2026NEUTRAL
    Here's How Much $100 Invested In Teradyne 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $100 in Teradyne Inc. five years ago would have grown to approximately $220 today, representing a compound annual growth rate of about 17%. This performance reflects the company's trajectory in the semiconductor test equipment market. While past performance is not indicative of future results, this historical return provides context for the stock's valuation and investor sentiment over the medium term. Investors should consider current market conditions and Teradyne's future growth prospects.

  • 4/10/2026NEUTRAL
    Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Teradyne Stock In The Last 5 Years

    An analysis of Teradyne Inc. stock performance over the past five years reveals a complex investment journey. While specific return figures are not detailed in the provided snippet, such historical performance reviews typically highlight periods of significant growth and potential drawdowns. Investors often use this data to gauge a company's resilience, growth trajectory, and management's effectiveness in navigating market cycles. The article likely aims to provide context for current investment decisions by illustrating past trends in revenue, profitability, and stock price movements, offering insights into the company's long-term value creation potential.

  • 3/9/2026POSITIVE
    If You Invested $100 In Teradyne Stock 5 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

    An investment of $100 in Teradyne Inc. (TER) five years ago would have yielded a significant return, illustrating the company's strong performance and growth trajectory. While specific figures are not provided in the summary, the premise suggests substantial capital appreciation for shareholders. This performance likely stems from advancements in Teradyne's semiconductor test equipment and automation solutions, catering to growing demand in sectors like AI and high-performance computing. Investors considering Teradyne should evaluate its competitive positioning and future innovation pipeline.

via Markets Gazette