返回排名列表

Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW)

POSITIVE
Financial ServicesCapital MarketsUnited States

基本面

80

价格

$108.21

市值

$23.12B

第一部分 · 这家公司值多少

概览

Tradeweb operates electronic marketplaces where banks, asset managers and other institutions buy and sell bonds, derivatives, ETFs and money-market instruments instead of trading by phone. It does not take positions itself: it connects buyers and sellers, runs the auction or request-for-quote process, and charges for access and for each trade executed. The London Stock Exchange Group is its majority shareholder, giving Tradeweb a large distribution partner but also tying its fortunes partly to a single controlling owner.

盈利方式

Most revenue comes from fees charged on trading volume, so it rises with how much clients trade rather than with market direction, plus a smaller and steadier stream from selling the trading data the platform generates. Because the marketplace itself is software, adding another trade or another data subscriber costs Tradeweb very little, so revenue growth tends to fall straight through to profit once the platform is built and dealers are connected to it.

分部营收

Rates54.8%

Trading of government bonds, mortgage securities, and interest-rate swaps and swaptions, the platform's original and largest business.

Credit22.2%

Electronic trading of corporate bonds, municipal bonds and credit derivatives across the United States and Europe.

Money Markets8.7%

Trading of repurchase agreements and other short-term funding instruments used by banks and asset managers.

Market Data6.6%

Licensing of pricing and trading data generated on the platform, sold to clients separately from trade execution itself.

Equities6.1%

Trading of ETFs and equity derivatives, a newer and smaller line built on the same institutional client base.

Other1.7%

Residual revenue not attributed to a specific asset class, including smaller emerging products still being scaled up.

护城河

网络效应 · 狭窄

A trading venue is worth more to a dealer the more buyers already use it, and worth more to a buyer the more dealers already quote on it, so an established platform is hard to dislodge once both sides are present in size. Tradeweb's edge is real where it leads, but well-capitalized rivals compete venue by venue, so the advantage is uneven.

需求驱动因素

周期性

Revenue tracks trading volumes, which rise when markets are volatile and rates or credit spreads are moving, and can fall in calm periods when institutions trade less. Underneath that cycle sits a steadier structural trend: more of bond and derivatives trading is moving from phone calls onto electronic platforms like Tradeweb's every year, which cushions the swings but does not eliminate them.

主要风险

  • Dealer client concentration — A limited number of large dealer clients account for a significant share of trading volume, and their contracts are non-exclusive and terminable, so losing a major one would be felt across the business.
  • Revenue tied to trading activity — Because fees are charged per trade, revenue depends on how much clients choose to trade, which can fall sharply in calm markets or if a client shifts volume to phone or a rival platform.
  • Majority shareholder relationship — London Stock Exchange Group controls Tradeweb and also runs data and post-trade businesses that can overlap with Tradeweb's own, creating potential conflicts of interest in how the relationship is managed.
  • Competition from voice and rival venues — Dealer clients still trade by phone, email and instant message, and other electronic platforms compete for the same flow, so Tradeweb must keep winning volume rather than assume it is locked in.

客户集中度

Not disclosed as a percentage, but the company states that a significant share of trading volume and revenue is concentrated among a limited number of large dealer clients.

看多理由

Buyers argue that the multi-decade shift of bond and derivatives trading from phone calls to electronic platforms still has years to run, that Tradeweb's leadership in rates and growing share in credit compound as more volume flows through, and that the low incremental cost of each extra trade lets revenue growth convert efficiently into profit.

看空理由

Sellers fear that revenue tied so closely to trading volume leaves the business exposed to any quiet stretch in markets, that a handful of large dealers hold real bargaining power over fees, and that LSEG's control and overlapping interests could shape decisions in ways that do not always favor Tradeweb's minority shareholders.

Written by the editors, published on 2026年8月18日

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

资产负债表与流动性

营收

$2.21B

最近12个月(截至2026/6/30)

净利润

$897M

最近12个月(截至2026/6/30)

自由现金流

$1.13B

股东权益合计

$6.51B

负债合计

$1.00B

流动比率

4.12

利息覆盖率

469.28

债务/EBITDA

0.14

每股收益

营收与净利润

自由现金流

收入构成

历史财务表

利润率变化

债务变化

债务负担有多重

增长一览表

增长 — 营业收入

公允价值估算

合理估值

公允价值

$115.18

当前价格

$108.21

安全边际

+6.1%

公允价值区间

$74.87 - $155.50

估算方法

Analyst Target:$123.71
DCF:-
PE-based:$93.79
Graham Growth:$215.70
EPV:$44.73
分析师共识:买入 (15B / 8H / 0S)
最近财报超预期:-0.78%

估值指标

市盈率(P/E)

25.87

ROE

12.5%

市净率(P/B)

-

P/FCF

0.00

毛利率

-

ROIC

-

盈利能力雷达图

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

-

WACC

8.0%

ROIC − WACC

-

基本面分析标准

通过(18)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 38.31%
  • Price CAGR 12.70%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 43.7%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 13.8%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 18.1%
  • Analyst Consensus 65% Buy
  • PEG Ratio 0.82
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.33
  • Share Dilution -0.1%
  • Net Margin Trend 40.7% vs 28.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 6/9

未通过(3)

  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • Earnings Surprise avg -0.2%

不可用(7)

  • ROIC NaN%
  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • P/FCF 0.00
  • P/B Ratio NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Current Ratio
  • Price below Graham Number

Piotroski F-评分

6/9

信号混杂:部分领域需关注

score
criteria

盈利质量

1.33

高质量:盈利有现金流支撑

股权稀释

-0.1%

正在回购股份,对股东友好

公司治理

管理团队

姓名职位年龄
Mr. William E. HultCEO & Director55
Ms. Sara Hassan FurberChief Financial Officer49
Mr. Justin Peterson Ph.D.Chief Technology Officer62
Mr. Enrico BruniManaging Director & Co-Head of Global Markets54
Mr. Troy DixonManaging Director & Co-Head of Global Markets53
Ms. Amy ClackChief Administrative Officer & Chief Risk Officer54
Mr. Ashley Neil Serrao C.F.A., C.M.A.MD, Head of Treasury, FP&A & Investor Relations-
Mr. Douglas Friedman J.D.Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel & Secretary55
Ms. Devi ShanmughamGlobal Head of Compliance-
Li Renn TsaiMD and Head of Product & Sales-

审计风险

1

董事会风险

6

薪酬风险

5

股东权利风险

10

第二部分 · 价格与买入时机

这一部分不判断公司是否值得拥有:它帮助你在基本面说服你之后,选择何时买入。包含:技术分析、潜力、历史回撤、Gamma 敞口。

Latest News

Recent headlines for TW, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 4/8/2026NEUTRAL
    Tradeweb CEO: Opportunities Around Predictive Markets

    Tradeweb CEO Billy Hult highlighted potential opportunities within predictive markets during a discussion on the bond trading landscape. While specific financial figures or forward-looking statements were not detailed, the commentary suggests a strategic focus on innovation and market development. Investors will monitor Tradeweb's future initiatives in this area, as advancements in predictive analytics could enhance trading efficiency and uncover new revenue streams for the company and its clients in the fixed income space.

  • 2/20/2026POSITIVE
    Tradeweb Strikes Deal to Show Kalshi Data

    Tradeweb Markets Inc. has struck a deal to integrate Kalshi Inc.'s prediction markets, making Kalshi's event-based contracts accessible to a broader institutional investor base. This strategic partnership expands Tradeweb's offerings and could boost trading volume and investor interest in both markets.

via Markets Gazette